Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-08-01 Thread Paul Kyzivat
On 7/31/17 11:49 PM, Prakash K wrote: Hi Paul, Thanks a lot, You have put it in a nice way , I understood the use-case for Forking But I have the following question *This all assumes that the 2xx matches an INVITE transaction you have pending, and that the from-tag and call-id match what w

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-08-01 Thread Robert Sparks
Be sure you are aware of (and implementing) the updates to RFC3261. You really need RFC6026 to answer this question cleanly. At the top level, this is far enough into "things are violating protocol" that the specs aren't going to give algorithmic advice. The closest they will get is that the

Re: [Sip-implementors] Processing of Standalone 200 OK response for INVITE ["200OK received by UA with different Call-id which is not in context"]

2017-08-01 Thread Paul Kyzivat
Robert, I agree with most of what you say, but have a comment on one point: On 8/1/17 12:23 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: Be sure you are aware of (and implementing) the updates to RFC3261. You really need RFC6026 to answer this question cleanly. At the top level, this is far enough into "things a