Re: [sipx-dev] Developer machine setup

2012-08-21 Thread Todd Hodgen
Thanks Kyle. -Original Message- From: sipx-dev-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-dev-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Haefner Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:06 PM To: sipXecs developer discussions Subject: Re: [sipx-dev] Developer machine setup Hi Todd, Here is th

Re: [sipx-dev] Developer machine setup

2012-08-21 Thread Kyle Haefner
Hi Todd, Here is the page that has always worked for me. The beauty of building RPMS is that your can easily install your newly minted version of sipx on a test system. http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Building+RPMS+on+CentOS+or+Fedora Kyle On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Todd Hodg

Re: [sipx-dev] 4.6 > Nat Traversal enabled but using static IP, stunserver messages

2012-08-21 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Tony Graziano < tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > Why is the system doing stun lookups when static ip is confugured? > > named[1193]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'stunserver.org//IN': > 2606:4100:3880:1232::2#53 > verifying availability maybe.

[sipx-dev] 4.6 > Nat Traversal enabled but using static IP, stunserver messages

2012-08-21 Thread Tony Graziano
Why is the system doing stun lookups when static ip is confugured? named[1193]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'stunserver.org//IN': 2606:4100:3880:1232::2#53 -- ~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: tgrazi...@voice.myitdepartment.net Fax: 434.465.683

Re: [sipx-dev] Developer machine setup

2012-08-21 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Todd Hodgen wrote: > Are the steps in the wiki for setting up a developer environment current > enough to work, or is there another process that is preferred these days. > I’ve got someone trying the wiki instructions without the best of luck. > > > > Seems they g

[sipx-dev] Developer machine setup

2012-08-21 Thread Todd Hodgen
Are the steps in the wiki for setting up a developer environment current enough to work, or is there another process that is preferred these days. I've got someone trying the wiki instructions without the best of luck. Seems they get stuck on "zerces" and "boost". Any sage advice to help a

Re: [sipx-dev] Include Device Files checkbox in backup

2012-08-21 Thread Kumaran
On 8/21/2012 2:43 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Kumaran > wrote: >> Hi All, >> Right now Include Device Files checkbox in backup is dependent for >> both Backup and Backup to FTP feature...So can we make Include Device >> Files checkbox independent to both Backu

Re: [sipx-dev] Include Device Files checkbox in backup

2012-08-21 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Kumaran wrote: > Hi All, >Right now Include Device Files checkbox in backup is dependent for > both Backup and Backup to FTP feature...So can we make Include Device > Files checkbox independent to both Backup and Backup to FTP feature? > Means that now if we di