I agree with Erich, for 3.8.0 it should be better to continue to use the
well-tested discover+udev approach. Moreover remember that 2.4 kernels
will not work without discover, since they don't support udev and sysfs.
This means that if we want to support some old distributions, still used
in produc
I also believe that integrating udevtrigger requires at least the amount of
changes as the tiny script, in addition to including the binary. I think udev
could handle USB devices as well, but don't particularly care about those,
actually. But the generation of hardware.lst requires some code, as we
Hi all:
udev is "supposed" to replace discover however we haven't got to the
point where udev can fully replace it yet (I tried a while back,
installation will fail if I remove discover bits).
So I think if Erich's script can solve our problems in the interim
before we fully integrate SystemImage
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 07:07:06PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2007 18:55, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > > I'd like to include a tiny script (attached) into boel_binaries which can
> > > solve one of
On Friday 16 February 2007 18:55, dann frazier wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > I'd like to include a tiny script (attached) into boel_binaries which can
> > solve one of our longest lasting problems: the inability to deal with unkown
> > hard
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'd like to include a tiny script (attached) into boel_binaries which can
> solve one of our longest lasting problems: the inability to deal with unkown
> hardware. Of course, we have UYOK, but that sometimes fails and is som
Guys,
I'd like to include a tiny script (attached) into boel_binaries which can
solve one of our longest lasting problems: the inability to deal with unkown
hardware. Of course, we have UYOK, but that sometimes fails and is somewhat
unconfortable to use. No, I don't want to replace UYOK. I just be