Subject
[sisuite-users] [ RFC ] SystemImager 4.0.2 or not? (was: client netboot
fails (rsync: failed to set times))
Hi all,
it seems that someone is agree with me and someone is not about the
solution to
add the pre-release of rsync (3.0.0pre4) into the stable branch of
SystemImager
and tag
4.0.2 or not? (was: client
netboot fails (rsync: failed to set times))
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrea,
I've read all the responses and there are merits to both 1 and 2 as
well as Bernard Li's response.
- My vote goes for 2.
- should not have binaries availble which are broken
Hi all,
it seems that someone is agree with me and someone is not about the solution to
add the pre-release of rsync (3.0.0pre4) into the stable branch of SystemImager
and tag the new 4.0.2 stable ASAP (4.0.1, since .1 is odd, is reserved for
development pre-releases).
So, probably this is the
