How to report a death by signal ? (was: loopwhilex)

2015-02-17 Thread Laurent Bercot
OK, I want to tackle this problem once and for all, because it has been gnawing at the edges of my mind for some time, and Olivier forced me to look it in the face, and it's not pretty. The situation is this: we have a parent process P (itself child of a grandparent process G) spawning a child

Re: loopwhilex

2015-02-17 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 18/02/2015 00:22, Olivier Brunel wrote: - First off, I found the doc to be a bit confusing, because you alternate between talking about when loopwhilex keeps running prog, and when it stops/exits. Yes, it's confusing, but it's still accurate. In fact, it's confusing enough that you yours

loopwhilex

2015-02-17 Thread Olivier Brunel
Hi, Couple of things regarding loopwhilex: - First off, I found the doc to be a bit confusing, because you alternate between talking about when loopwhilex keeps running prog, and when it stops/exits. In fact, it's confusing enough that you yourself got it wrong :p " -n : negate the test: run pro

Re: Problems w/ last s6-log

2015-02-17 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 17/02/2015 20:34, Roy Lanek wrote: The problem is w/ the regular express. W/ s6-2.1.1.0 s6-log (...) What's that s6-2.1.1.0 you're speaking of ? Nobody has heard of that around here... The latest release is s6-2.1.1.1, and I cannot reproduce that problem with s6-log here. (In all serious

Problems w/ last s6-log

2015-02-17 Thread Roy Lanek
The following worked up to s6-2.1.0.1: ... /command/export PATH /command:/etc... multisubstitute { define LOGS /var/log/s6/socklog-klog define IDX \[[0-9]+\] define SID SID[0-9]+ define LBL \[[[:space:]]*[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\] define KRN_ANY kern\.[[:alnum:]]+

Re: s6, execline, skalibs in FreeBSD

2015-02-17 Thread Daniel Kruszyna
Paul Jarc wrote: > Colin Booth wrote: > > It did necessitate breaking the Freebsd port of Paul Jarc's runwhen. > > I have a new version in the works that will build with the latest > skalibs. Good to hear :) -- Daniel