Laurent Bercot <ska-skaw...@skarnet.org> wrote: > There *may* come a time when I add the handling for N arguments > to some s6 commands (s6-svc comes to mind), which is another > reason why I don't want to treat too many arguments as an error > for now.
I'm in favor of adding that handling, but until that happens I'd say an error message is appropriate. The command isn't actually doing what the user probably intends, and it would be helpful to let them know that. It's all the more helpful if the behavior for that invocation is likely to change in the future. paul
