On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Guillaume Perréal wrote:
> Pandoc (http://pandoc.org/) might be useful. The out-of-the-box template is
> ugly, but nonetheless usable.
>
That's what I was using but the post-processing editing overhead was
too high without digging in and adjusting the conversion te
Pandoc (http://pandoc.org/) might be useful. The out-of-the-box template
is ugly, but nonetheless usable.
Regards,
Guillaume.
Le 26/03/2017 à 08:18, Colin Booth a écrit :
On Mar 25, 2017 10:01 PM, "S. Gilles" wrote:
This is a rather silly question, but the other day I wanted to look
up the
