> Would this difference explains why there is no redefinition linking
> error with musl, or am I missing something?
I don't know. I will ask people who know. It is strange indeed;
I didn't even notice that the strnlen sysdep was "no" with musl,
else I would have fixed it...
What is the
2018-01-12 23:10 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot:
>
> There are modules for which a /sys/class entry, and an appropriate
> major/minor pair for mdevd to create the device node, only appear when
> the module is loaded, and there's no prior uevent file to trigger
> loading the module: the one I've tested