On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 03:21:43PM +0100, Oliver Schad wrote:
> I completely understand the purpose of execline but for server systems,
> which allocates more than 1 GB RAM regulary and running on modern x86
> CPUs, saving such resources is not needed for us(!).
Which is also why I usually avoided
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 21:30:36 +0800
"Casper Ti. Vector" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:33:50PM +0100, Oliver Schad wrote:
> [...]
>
> A history note: once a friend of mine, when introduced to execline,
> told me about the Thompson shell [1]. The Wikipedia page said, "by
> the 1975 releas
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:33:50PM +0100, Oliver Schad wrote:
> We found the project "slew"[1] which offers a nice way to manage oneshot
> services, cause execline doesn't offer the things we want to re-use
> today.
A history note: once a friend of mine, when introduced to execline, told
me about
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 02:33:50PM +0100, Oliver Schad wrote:
> The next question was the long-term strategy with systemd: we have 2
> approaches
>
> 1) mix systemd (PID 1) to use the boot phase (especially one shots)
> and later (after system initialization) use s6 to manage all services.
> 2) ju