Brett Neumeier writes:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:30 AM Profpatsch wrote:
>
>> > -f: do not doublefork. Use if the daemon waits for children it does
>> > not know it has (for instance, superservers do this). When in doubt,
>> > do not use that option, or you may have a zombie hangi
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:30:27PM +0100, Profpatsch wrote:
> > -f: do not doublefork. Use if the daemon waits for children it does
> > not know it has (for instance, superservers do this). When in doubt,
> > do not use that option, or you may have a zombie hanging around.
>
> > when i
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:30 AM Profpatsch wrote:
> > -f: do not doublefork. Use if the daemon waits for children it does
> > not know it has (for instance, superservers do this). When in doubt,
> > do not use that option, or you may have a zombie hanging around.
> Is the “that” here r
> -f: do not doublefork. Use if the daemon waits for children it does
> not know it has (for instance, superservers do this). When in doubt,
> do not use that option, or you may have a zombie hanging around.
> when in doubt, do not use that option
Is the “that” here referring to the `