Brett Neumeier <bneume...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:30 AM Profpatsch <m...@profpatsch.de> wrote: > >> > -f: do not doublefork. Use if the daemon waits for children it does >> > not know it has (for instance, superservers do this). When in doubt, >> > do not use that option, or you may have a zombie hanging around. >> Is the “that” here referring to the `-f` option or the daemon? >> In the first case, “do not use >this< option” is less ambiguous. >> > Hello Profpatsch! > > Double-forking is a common idiom for daemon processes, as described for > example here: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/881388 > > … Thanks all for the explanations! -- Written with Emacs (mu4e) on NixOS. Q: Why is this email five sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es/ May take up to five days to read your message. If it’s urgent, call me.
