On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:47:32PM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> I have asked landley before whether he shared my interests for weird
> things such as using less resources than the shell, or supervision
> systems. His answer was a resounding and unambiguous "no". His interests
> are focused on ma
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 02:34:41PM -0400, Zach van Rijn wrote:
> The ones in [3] are not stripped, and that accounts for most of
> the size discrepancy. I will ask Rob to consider adding that to
> his 'mcm-buildall.sh' script. I simply build/host binaries.
Thanks for explanation; now I understand.
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 20:47 +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> The existence of my toolchains, and Zach's, is relatively
> independent from the existence of lh-bootstrap and mkroot.
I can only speak for 'mkroot' and say that my toolchains came to
exist upon Landley's remark that "someone should do t
The existence of my toolchains, and Zach's, is relatively independent
from the existence of lh-bootstrap and mkroot.
As far as I'm concerned, the creation of these toolchains was an
exercise in working with musl-cross-make at start - and then some
people found them useful, so I built them for
On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 01:39 +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> Although I have tried neither of lh-bootstrap or mkroot [1], I
> noticed that the toolchains of the former is nearly one
> magnitude smaller than those [2] of the latter, while both
> seem to be based on musl and statically linked.
>
>
