Re: [Sks-devel] Re: problems with SKS 1.0.10 when searching by key ID from GnuPG

2009-03-24 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2009-03-24 at 11:57 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Are these scripts published? (this is out of curiosity more than > anything else) Well, since it's just curiosity, I'll pipe in with something roughly equivalent to the IP generation side: http://sks.spodhuis.org/sks-peers/ip-valid No

Re: [Sks-devel] problems with SKS 1.0.10 when searching by key ID from GnuPG

2009-03-24 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2009-03-24 at 11:12 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 03/23/2009 07:05 PM, John Clizbe wrote: > > Folks may be holding back from upgrading because they don't want to > > upgrade their Berkeley DB version to 4.6. > > That does sound unpleasant. Who on the list has done this process? Has >

Re: [Sks-devel] problems with SKS 1.0.10 when searching by key ID from GnuPG

2009-03-24 Thread jack-sks-devel
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:02:22PM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > The odd thing here is that version has been broken for at least 2 > years, as I reported the problem in 2006. Did nobody else notice, or > are there still a bunch of 1.0.9 SKSes out there? I went from 1.0.9 -> 1.1.0, skipping 1.0.10.

Re: [Sks-devel] Re: problems with SKS 1.0.10 when searching by key ID from GnuPG

2009-03-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 03/24/2009 11:39 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > But I'm always open for suggestions. As for now I already have blacklist > on aliases/ips, but there is an RFE to block certain versions? I'd like to propose blacklisting SKS version 1.0.10 from the main pool, because of that version's misbeha

[Sks-devel] Re: problems with SKS 1.0.10 when searching by key ID from GnuPG

2009-03-24 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote, On 03/23/2009 09:17 PM: > On 03/23/2009 04:02 PM, David Shaw wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 07:41:50PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >>> has any thought been >>> given to requiring members of the keyserver pools to n

Re: [Sks-devel] problems with SKS 1.0.10 when searching by key ID from GnuPG

2009-03-24 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 03/23/2009 07:05 PM, John Clizbe wrote: > David Shaw wrote: >> None that I know of. Eventually, such a thing will be necessary, but >> it would have to be done via whoever controls the particular keyserver >> round-robin. > > Or convince the keyserver operators running 1.0.10 to upgrade to 1.1

Re: [Sks-devel] keyserver.gingerbear.net: Dynamic IP Update didn't

2009-03-24 Thread Gabor Kiss
> It'll be nice to have a new release with recon doing regular reloads of > membership. Then I can stop bugging folks to `touch membership`. > keys.niif.hu Done. Regards Gabor ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/m

[Sks-devel] keyserver.gingerbear.net: Dynamic IP Update didn't

2009-03-24 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If your server is peered with keyserver.gingerbear.net: Time-Warner did it again, around 01:20AM (US/Central) on Monday. Everything should now be squared away. I checked several DNS servers and they are showing the new address for keyserver.gingerbea