Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hey... Oh my goodness... Now listen: On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 18:54 -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: No. And I advise all others to avoid peering with you until you can prove that you own the private key that will be associated with the keyserver. I was already willing to put some

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 8/22/2010 8:04 AM, Arnold wrote: This is a national law / ruling applicable to just one country. Even less than that. It's a state law applicable to just one state -- neither one of our largest nor most populous. (It is beautiful and I've found the people there to generally be quite

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 8/22/2010 10:47 AM, David Shaw wrote: Robert, are you really saying what you seem to be saying? The action of the owners doesn't make a keyserver a CA. That makes the person running the keyserver a CA. Yes. I was using keyserver as synonymous for keyserver operator. Imprecise language, I

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 8/22/2010 10:54 AM, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: Because none of the information provided indicates in any way that the private key corresponding with the public key provided is under Chris' control. If Christoph were himself making assurances about certificates, this would be

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 11:04 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote: On 8/22/2010 10:54 AM, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: Because none of the information provided indicates in any way that the private key corresponding with the public key provided is under Chris' control. If Christoph were

Re: [Sks-devel] Seeking peers for keyserver.ftbfs.org

2010-08-22 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:51:59AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: I'm looking for peers for a new SKS keyserver installation. I'm running SKS version 1.1.0 on keyserver.ftbfs.org. This is a private machine. The server is physically located in Sweden. The machine has IPv6 connectivity, but I

Re: [Sks-devel] Seeking peers for keyserver.ftbfs.org

2010-08-22 Thread Kim Minh Kaplan
Matt Kraai: I haven't been able to figure out how to make sks listen on both IPv4 and IPv6. You need SKS 1.1.1 for IPv6 support. -- Kim Minh ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

[Sks-devel] Re: Seeking peers for keyserver.ftbfs.org

2010-08-22 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 09:51:59AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: I'm running SKS version 1.1.0 on keyserver.ftbfs.org. ... The machine has IPv6 connectivity, but I haven't been able to figure out how to make sks listen on both IPv4 and

Re: [Sks-devel] Seeking peers for keyserver.ftbfs.org

2010-08-22 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:23:43PM +, Kim Minh Kaplan wrote: Matt Kraai: I haven't been able to figure out how to make sks listen on both IPv4 and IPv6. You need SKS 1.1.1 for IPv6 support. Thanks. After upgrading, I was able to get IPv6 to work. Is there a way to listen on all

Re: [Sks-devel] Seeking peers for keyserver.ftbfs.org

2010-08-22 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
Note that if you checkout the Mercurial version you can just put your hostname and SKS will use all its addresses. Thanks for the instructions and URL. I'm able to connect to SKS using any address if I use ::, although netstat -l only shows it as listening for IPv6 connections. Are you

Re: [Sks-devel] Seeking peers for keyserver.ftbfs.org

2010-08-22 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 07:31:11PM +, Kim Minh Kaplan wrote: Matt Kraai writes: Thanks for the instructions and URL. I'm able to connect to SKS using any address if I use ::, although netstat -l only shows it as listening for IPv6 connections. Although it may appear to work at

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 12:56 -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: The necessary root-CAs are available from the International Grid Trust Federation (www.igtf.net) Thank you. I will review their CPS and make a decision regarding trust at a later time. I am more hesitant to add CAs to

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread John Clizbe
C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: Associated with what? With my key? With the keyserver? The email address you used when requesting peers. The email address which I will associate with the keyserver you claim to operate when you confirm for me that you have physical access to the private key

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 10:49 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote: Yes. I was using keyserver as synonymous for keyserver operator. Imprecise language, I grant, but that's English for you. Neverteheless? Why should a keyserver or keyserver operator be a CA or act in such a role? A CA is an entity

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 14:48 -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: It was published on a CD, signed by Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org, a Debian Developer whose identity was verified in person by another DD: And you believe that Philipp has met officials for all the CAs included in the Mozilla

Re: [Sks-devel] new keyserver online

2010-08-22 Thread C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 23:56 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 14:48 -0700, C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: It was published on a CD, signed by Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org, a Debian Developer whose identity was verified in person by another DD: And you believe