Hello,
due to comprehensive changes to my sks server, key.ip6.li will be down from
08:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m (UTC)
Following changes are planned:
* Migration from Debian Squeeze to CentOS
* Upgrade sks 1.1.1 (Debian package) to 1.1.3 (EPEL package)
* Access through web application firewall
* doubl
On 04/20/2012 08:44 PM, John Clizbe wrote:
> I think we could host the .deb(s) on the Google Code download page
> Would you need a .deb. for each Debian release?
If the packaging meets debian quality standards, i think we can pretty
easily get it into debian proper -- no need to host it on the goo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
John Clizbe wrote:
> Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> On 4/20/12 2:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> I suspect the trickiest parts might be thinking about how to get a
>>> smooth upgrade from 1.1.1 and possibly how to deal with a transition
>>> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 4/20/12 2:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I suspect the trickiest parts might be thinking about how to get a
>> smooth upgrade from 1.1.1 and possibly how to deal with a transition
>> to a newer version of bdb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1,SHA256
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> (aside from 1st hand experience)
>> Watch out for db-5.2.19 -> db-5.2.25 however. Someone
>
> This should have been db-5.1.19 -> db-5.1.25.
Yeah, I belie
On Apr 20, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> (aside from 1st hand experience)
> Watch out for db-5.2.19 -> db-5.2.25 however. Someone
This should have been db-5.1.19 -> db-5.1.25.
73 de Jeff
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> I suspect the trickiest parts might be thinking about how to get a
> smooth upgrade from 1.1.1 and possibly how to deal with a transition to
> a newer version of bdb or ocaml. But i haven't looked into it beyond that.
>
Berkeley DB _
On 20.04.2012 10:32, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> He wrote to me personally that there will be no new SKS debian package
> and that is simply not acceptable for the most common Linux server
> Distribution.
>
> He gave me that statement when i asked him regarding the 1.1.2 version
> and it seems that n
On 4/20/12 2:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I suspect the trickiest parts might be thinking about how to get a
> smooth upgrade from 1.1.1 and possibly how to deal with a transition
> to a newer version of bdb or ocaml. But i haven't looked into it
> beyond that.
Oh, ouch. Yes, I hadn't th
On 04/20/2012 01:17 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If we're in need of 1.1.3 packages for Debian and Debian-derived
> distros, I might be able to help. My OCaml is no better than functional
> (pardon the pun) and my knowledge of .debs is far from comprehensive,
> but I have free time to devote to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20.04.2012 19:20, Mike Doty wrote:
>
> Yes, I recall cryptokit being a major PITA as I was writing the
> ebuild and I think it came down to the version of ocaml used.
> Could you file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org and we'll get it
> sorted?
>
On 04/20/12 10:06, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 20.04.2012 18:47, Mike Doty wrote:
>> On 04/20/12 08:44, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> Hi Sebastian (and other folks interested in sks in debian)--
>>>
>>> On 04/20/2012 04:32 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Just for everyone who depends on a d
If we're in need of 1.1.3 packages for Debian and Debian-derived
distros, I might be able to help. My OCaml is no better than functional
(pardon the pun) and my knowledge of .debs is far from comprehensive,
but I have free time to devote to this.
At present I have zero interest in "taking over" f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20.04.2012 18:47, Mike Doty wrote:
> On 04/20/12 08:44, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian (and other folks interested in sks in debian)--
>>
>> On 04/20/2012 04:32 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
>>> Just for everyone who depends on a debian
On 04/20/12 08:44, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Sebastian (and other folks interested in sks in debian)--
>
> On 04/20/2012 04:32 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
>> Just for everyone who depends on a debian sks package. I complained to
>> the the debian project about Christoph Martin (Main Debian S
Hi Sebastian (and other folks interested in sks in debian)--
On 04/20/2012 04:32 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Just for everyone who depends on a debian sks package. I complained to
> the the debian project about Christoph Martin (Main Debian SKS
> developer) and im also trying to get him removed
On 2012-04-20 15:34, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Am Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:51:32 +0100
schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire :
Hi,
Where? I have not seen this complaint.
Sorry, how could i forget the red tape. Will do so.
> He wrote to me personally that there will be no new SKS debian
> package
> and that
Am Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:51:32 +0100
schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire :
Hi,
> Where? I have not seen this complaint.
Sorry, how could i forget the red tape. Will do so.
> > He wrote to me personally that there will be no new SKS debian
> > package
> > and that is simply not acceptable for the most com
On 2012-04-20 09:32, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
Hi,
Just for everyone who depends on a debian sks package. I complained
to
the the debian project about Christoph Martin (Main Debian SKS
developer) and im also trying to get him removed from that position
as
well.
Where? I have not seen this co
On 04/20/2012 04:32 AM, Sebastian Urbach wrote:
> Just for everyone who depends on a debian sks package. I complained to
> the the debian project about Christoph Martin (Main Debian SKS
> developer) and im also trying to get him removed from that position as
> well.
This is unlikely to get the res
Tempting fate, I upgraded FreeBSD (8.2 -> 9.0) and SKS to 1.1.3 a few days ago.
So far, so good.
-jav
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
> Just for everyone who depends on a debian sks package. I complained to
> the the debian project about Christoph Martin (Main Debian SKS
> developer) and im also trying to get him removed from that position as
> well.
>
> He wrote to me personally that there will be no new SKS debian package
> an
Hi,
Just for everyone who depends on a debian sks package. I complained to
the the debian project about Christoph Martin (Main Debian SKS
developer) and im also trying to get him removed from that position as
well.
He wrote to me personally that there will be no new SKS debian package
and that is
Hi,
I just want to tribute my 0,2 Cents to the pool changes from Kristian.
It seems to me that we were having a way smaller difference in
the total keys numbers since the recent changes.
I would assume that this is an effect from the "minimum version"
change. We've lost around 30 servers in the p
24 matches
Mail list logo
