Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Sebastian Urbach
Am Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:19:48 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net: Hi, On 04/21/2012 09:57 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: I've never packaged for the Debian trees: I've only ever made .debs for my own local installation. Should I set up a VM with Debian Unstable and

Re: [Sks-devel] simple DoS against SKS's HKP interface :/

2012-04-23 Thread Johan van Selst
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Fix? I'm afraid i don't know ocaml at all, so i don't have a proposed fix. It seems to be related to the event loop model on the sks db process, though. Looking at it from a system call level: either sks should be multi-threaded, or reads from network sockets

Re: [Sks-devel] sks-keyservers.net: New inclusion criteria for pool

2012-04-23 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 23.04.2012 04:26, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 04/22/2012 11:26 AM, Christian Felsing wrote: how do you detect presence of a reverse proxy ? Today I did set up a reverse proxy based on Apache httpd for testing. On status page proxy did not

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 19:44 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: See my message from last night with the 11:38PM CDT timestamp. Upgrading for DB is pretty painless. Well if this is not possible, just add a NEWS entry, fully describing what have to be done. Generally it would be a good idea, to extensively

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 14:56 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: And the recommended -- by SleepyCat -- solution is to internalize Berkeley DB to avoid breakage between different applications compiled against different libraries. With internalise you mean that the package should ship it's own copy of

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 14:56 -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: And the recommended -- by SleepyCat -- solution is to internalize Berkeley DB to avoid breakage between different applications compiled against different libraries. With

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

2012-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Apr 23, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote: I don't know whether 175KB is still accurate: but Berkeley DB isn't huge by any means. Here is the current size of a Berkeley DB smallbuild The resulting library is approximately one-half megabyte and contains everything

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS debian package

2012-04-23 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA256 Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 19:44 -0500, John Clizbe wrote: See my message from last night with the 11:38PM CDT timestamp. Upgrading for DB is pretty painless. Well if this is not possible, just add a NEWS entry,

Re: [Sks-devel] simple DoS against SKS's HKP interface :/

2012-04-23 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1,SHA256 Johan van Selst wrote: Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Fix? I'm afraid i don't know ocaml at all, so i don't have a proposed fix. It seems to be related to the event loop model on the sks db process, though. Looking at it from a system