Re: [Sks-devel] dealing with misplaced signatures

2012-07-31 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 2012-07-31 23:29, David Shaw wrote: What's happening here is that the key is mangled on SKS (whether SKS mangled it or it was imported already mangled doesn't matter). GPG fetches it, and there is some code to move misplaced packets to the right place. Unfortunately, as you noticed, that

Re: [Sks-devel] dealing with misplaced signatures

2012-07-31 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 07/31/2012 06:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: Currently we have a patch[0] ready that allows for these signatures to be cleaned in the getting (and vindex) of the key, A patch with the stated functionality would be a Good Thing. However, before creating a Pull Request into the SKS

Re: [Sks-devel] dealing with misplaced signatures

2012-07-31 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 2012-08-01 00:53, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 07/31/2012 06:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: ... If anything, the current sks implementation is violating RFC 4880, which clearly states that transferable public key certificates contain: - After each Subkey packet, one