Re: [Sks-devel] sks-keyservers.net New HKPS subpool added

2012-10-06 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 10/05/2012 06:23 PM, Phil Pennock wrote: Speaking for myself, I only use TLSv1+ and my nginx is built with SNI support, so if you want to figure out a policy for handing out certs, I can add a new cert for SNI hostnames in *.pool.sks-keyservers.net. alternately (or in addition?), we could

Re: [Sks-devel] sks-keyservers.net New HKPS subpool added

2012-10-06 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 10/06/2012 12:23 AM, Phil Pennock wrote: I get results from: dig -t a hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net dig -t srv _pgpkey-https._tcp.hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net but not from: dig -t hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net (NOERROR, with AUTHORITY section, so just looks as though there are

[Sks-devel] SRV records and HKPS requests

2012-10-06 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
Hi, In relation to setting up a HKPS pool for sks-keyservers.net[0] I've encountered a scenario where some input would be appreciated. In the process of trying to figure out a mechanism to not have to disable certificate checking when using the pool (I quite like DKG's approach in [1]) I set up

Re: [Sks-devel] sks-keyservers.net New HKPS subpool added

2012-10-06 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-10-06 at 11:12 +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: I'ld like to add ssl to my server, but prior I'm afraid I need a few questions answered. If I'm going to install a self-signed *.pool.sks-keyservers.net, that CRT wouldn't have any reputation. As long as there's no additional trust added

Re: [Sks-devel] SRV records and HKPS requests

2012-10-06 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-10-06 at 22:20 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote: So, there's a `port` and an `opt-port`; the SRV lookups set `opt-port` but not `port`, while the URL given to curl uses `port`. It seems like changing 537 to: port = opt-port = newport should fix it as a stop-gap. bugs.g10code.com is