Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/13/2015 11:27 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi! > > Kristian Fiskerstrand > writes: >> as mentioned in [0] an experimental tor hidden service based on >> onionbalance is running on

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp

On Thursday 12 November 2015 20:43 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > Speaking of things that haven't been properly announced, > > as mentioned in [0] an experimental tor hidden service based on > onionbalance is running on hkp://jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion . A Tor column > is added to the status pages,

[Sks-devel] less opaque error for "too many results"?

We occasionally get requests / reports from users, indicating that our keyserver raised an exception on a particular query. One of the issues that I've seen multiple times, is that the user specified a query that returned too many results, such as:

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?

On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 01:15 +0100, Hendrik Grewe wrote: > I would imagine not leaving the tor network through an exit is the > benefit. And what should be the benefit of that? If tor works right, there is none, if it doesn't there wouldn't be any either, when you "not leave it" when you hit the

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?

On Fri 2015-11-13 20:36:40 -0500, Alain Wolf wrote: > On 14.11.2015 at 01:23, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 01:15 +0100, Hendrik Grewe wrote: >>> I would imagine not leaving the tor network through an exit is the >>> benefit. >> And what should be the benefit of that? >

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14.11.2015 at 01:23, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 01:15 +0100, Hendrik Grewe wrote: >> I would imagine not leaving the tor network through an exit is the >> benefit. > And what should be the benefit of that? What is the

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?

> I'm not sure whether burn care would be really an issues for (most of) > us... at least not as long cryptography itself isn't made "illegal". > Our services are typically not illegal or morally questionable...so > even if "they" would come after you... well... so what? The "so what?" is, if

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service - what's the rationale?

On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 02:36 +0100, Alain Wolf wrote: > >And what should be the benefit of that? > What is the benefit of leaving Tor? Well you can't argue like that, can you? At least it alone wouldn't be argument enough for me to set up such service. Running additional code, here tor, always

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp

Hi! Kristian Fiskerstrand writes: > as mentioned in [0] an experimental tor hidden service based on > onionbalance is running on hkp://jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion . A Tor column > is added to the status pages, and participation requires manual >

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp

On Fri 2015-11-13 06:08:37 -0500, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 11/13/2015 11:27 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Is there some documentation published on what is needed on the side >> of a keyserver operator? I'd really like to get my keyserver added >> there (next week sounds good for doing the

Re: [Sks-devel] Tor hidden service /onionbalance for hkp

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/13/2015 03:42 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2015-11-13 06:08:37 -0500, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 11/13/2015 11:27 AM, Christoph Egger wrote: >>> Is there some documentation published on what is needed on the >>> side of a