On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Andreas Puls wrote:
> > One can decide to setup a proxy server without any own backend
> > but redirecting queries to some of the existing servers.
> > No one would recognize the cheating. :-)
> >
> Looks like somebody already done that :)
> Just got a reuqest for the host
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 13:28, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>
> I happened to check the pool just now, and there are only three nodes in it:
>
> 1 pgpkeys.uk[@]
> 2 sks.pod01.fleetstreetops.com[@]
> 3 sks.pod02.fleetstreetops.com[@]
>
> Looking at the cached metadata it appears that when
That looks more like a DNS CNAME, not a proxy. The same goes for this popular
one:
keys.gnupg.net is an alias for hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net.
-T
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 14:42, Andreas Puls wrote:
>
>
> Am 22.03.2021 um 21:08 schrieb Kiss Gabor (Bitman):
>> One can decide to setup a proxy
I think (c) is fine to keep the pool alive. This community has a devout
adherence to a tradition of inaction. I'm not holding my breath for
(b), but I would be delighted if someone did more than just talk about
it.
I hold that switching to hkps://keys.openpgp.org is the path forward,
and we
In addition I’ve got an interesting story, last time I seen the SKS keyserver
pool mentioned outside this group was recently when I got acquired by one of
the Linux Distros and one of the first steps they wanted all of us to do was
create PGP keys off our old corp email and submit em to the SKS
On my Mac here the GPG Keychain app now defaults to hkps://keys.openpgp.org
, Ubuntu is using their own HP servers now that are
not joining the pool, and these searches on Github is a bit depressing, lots of
commits setting the same server as default and/or removing the SKS pool:
On 22/03/2021 22:02, Ryan Hunt wrote:
I concur with the rest of the sentiment, I think its time to start
accepting HP as a replacement for SKS.. If the sks-pool will not
recognize the value of HP servers I suppose our only recourse is to
fake it for the time being.
However I’d like to see
I concur with the rest of the sentiment, I think its time to start accepting HP
as a replacement for SKS.. If the sks-pool will not recognize the value of HP
servers I suppose our only recourse is to fake it for the time being.
However I’d like to see some efforts made towards:
- Rolling our
Am 22.03.2021 um 21:08 schrieb Kiss Gabor (Bitman):
One can decide to setup a proxy server without any own backend
but redirecting queries to some of the existing servers.
No one would recognize the cheating. :-)
Looks like somebody already done that :)
Just got a reuqest for the host
Am 22.03.2021 um 21:08 schrieb Kiss Gabor (Bitman):
One can decide to setup a proxy server without any own backend
but redirecting queries to some of the existing servers.
No one would recognize the cheating. :-)
Looks like somebody already done that :)
Just got a reuqest for the host
On 22/03/2021 20:45, Martin Dobrev wrote:
Is it not time to extend the list of initial servers then?
$initial_servers = array("keys2.kfwebs.net", "zimmermann.mayfirst.org", "keyserver.kim-minh.com",
"pgp.circl.lu", "keys.niif.hu", "sks.b4ckbone.de", "keyserver.opensuse.org");
>
Is it not time to extend the list of initial servers then?
$initial_servers = array("keys2.kfwebs.net", "zimmermann.mayfirst.org", "keyserver.kim-minh.com",
"pgp.circl.lu", "keys.niif.hu", "sks.b4ckbone.de", "keyserver.opensuse.org");
keyserver.dobrev.eu is peered to two of them and yet
I happened to check the pool just now, and there are only three nodes in it:
1 pgpkeys.uk[@]
2 sks.pod01.fleetstreetops.com[@]
3 sks.pod02.fleetstreetops.com[@]
Looking at the cached metadata it appears that when the spider ran,
pod02.fleetstreetops nodes was unavailable, as
On 22/03/2021 20:10, Martin Dobrev wrote:
c) We agree that Hockeypuck lying to be SKS is accepted in the pool,
and maybe even recommended.
I would favor (c), plus keeping the version number in the 2.x range,
so that experts still can tell the difference.
I'm already doing c) if I want to
Am 22.03.2021 um 20:41 schrieb Marcel Waldvogel:
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 22:56 +0100, Andreas Puls wrote:
I've created now a patch that just replaces in the json export
contact
with server_contact and Total with numkeys.
On 22/03/2021 19:41, Marcel Waldvogel wrote:
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 22:56 +0100, Andreas Puls wrote:
I've created now a patch that just replaces in the json export contact
with server_contact and Total with numkeys.
One can decide to setup a proxy server without any own backend
but redirecting queries to some of the existing servers.
No one would recognize the cheating. :-)
Gabor
--
"Virgil Brigman back on the air" (Abyss)
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Marcel Waldvogel wrote:
> a) We leave it as is, Hockeypuck is fine, but just not in the pool.
> b) We create a second pool, where Hockeypuck is acceptable (and
> probably SKS as well).
> c) We agree that Hockeypuck lying to be SKS is accepted in the pool,
> and maybe even
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 22:56 +0100, Andreas Puls wrote:
>
> I've created now a patch that just replaces in the json export
> contact
> with server_contact and Total with numkeys.
> https://github.com/apuls/hockeypuck/commit/34fbdfcf73b60e6001f3770b86d8750d1c8b5385
Great, thanks! I just merged
19 matches
Mail list logo
