Re: Lying about Hockeypuck being SKS?

On 22/03/2021 22:02, Ryan Hunt wrote: However I’d like to see some efforts made towards:  - Rolling our SKS hacks back upstream with HP, initially this seems stupid but HP has already put in efforts to maintain compatibility with SKS peers.. I think a transitional SKS emulation mode that is

Re: keyserver.dobrev.eu is back running Hockeypuck

On 23/03/2021 13:32, Martin Dobrev wrote: Only way to "overwrite" it is to output Software

Re: Lying about Hockeypuck being SKS?

I did this earlier for keyserver.dobrev.eu. On 23/03/2021 09:37, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > On 23/03/2021 09:19, Marcel Waldvogel wrote: >> How about instead of claiming to be "SKS", Hockeypuck servers just >> claim to be "Hockeypuck" (title case instead of lower case)? That >> would be kind of a

Re: Pool dried up

> On Mar 23, 2021, at 02:38, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > > Hi, Todd. > > On 23/03/2021 03:37, Todd Fleisher wrote: >>> On Mar 22, 2021, at 13:28, Andrew Gallagher >> > wrote: >>> >>> I happened to check the pool just now, and there are only three nodes in it: >>> >>>

Re: keyserver.dobrev.eu is back running Hockeypuck

On 23/03/2021 12:58, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > On 21/03/2021 21:48, Martin Dobrev wrote: >> I had to play with mod_rewrite and force a redirect from >> //pks/lookup?op=stats=mr/ to //pks/lookup?op=stats /to let >> the script parse HTML. I don't have a proper explanation why peers >> and recon

Re: keyserver.dobrev.eu is back running Hockeypuck

On 21/03/2021 21:48, Martin Dobrev wrote: I had to play with mod_rewrite and force a redirect from //pks/lookup?op=stats=mr/ to //pks/lookup?op=stats /to let the script parse HTML. I don't have a proper explanation why peers and recon port are not picked from the produced JSON but left out

Re: Pool dried up

Hi, Todd. On 23/03/2021 03:37, Todd Fleisher wrote: On Mar 22, 2021, at 13:28, Andrew Gallagher > wrote: I happened to check the pool just now, and there are only three nodes in it: 1pgpkeys.uk [@] 2sks.pod01.fleetstreetops.com

Re: Lying about Hockeypuck being SKS?

On 23/03/2021 09:19, Marcel Waldvogel wrote: How about instead of claiming to be "SKS", Hockeypuck servers just claim to be "Hockeypuck" (title case instead of lower case)? That would be kind of a "white(list) lie". They will have a red cell, but that will not preclude their Sounds good to

Re: Lying about Hockeypuck being SKS?

pgpkeys.eu is in the pool, however, the "Software" table cell is red. Further investigation showed that they spell "sks" in lower case, unlike the real SKS. Verifying against the source code [1], the server selection code is a blacklist: "SKS" < 1.1.6, "GnuKS", and "hockeypuck" are blacklisted

Re: An evil idea :-)

Gabor, so, please call me Mr. Evil ;-) A few weeks ago, I set up a simple Nginx load balancer (two lines with https-portal[1]) statically seeded with the nodes that were in the pool at that time for test purposes. It randomly returns the status page of one of the backend servers, though, but