On Apr 6, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:37 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>>
>> Just rig it up similarly to how DNS does it. Rank things in order of
>> performance, and then artificially penalize the fastest ones on each
>> iteration until they aren't the fastest any m
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:37 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>
> Just rig it up similarly to how DNS does it. Rank things in order of
> performance, and then artificially penalize the fastest ones on each
> iteration until they aren't the fastest any more. Then repeat. The goal
> isn't perfection - it's j
On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:43 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Apr 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>
>>> I also did some minor fiddeling around with the priorities. It still
>>> only returns a limited amount of records (currently 10)
On Apr 6, 2010, at 1:43 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>> I also did some minor fiddeling around with the priorities. It still
>> only returns a limited amount of records (currently 10), but those with
>> a higher weight are always prioritized
On Apr 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> I also did some minor fiddeling around with the priorities. It still
> only returns a limited amount of records (currently 10), but those with
> a higher weight are always prioritized in the selection as well.
>
> Feel free to come with i
On Apr 5, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> David Shaw wrote, On 04/05/2010 09:25 PM:
>> On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 00:13 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry I can't answer your other questions, but I just had a look
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote, On 04/05/2010 10:50 PM:
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>> David Shaw wrote, On 04/05/2010 09:25 PM:
>>> On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
>>>
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 00:13 -0400, Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David Shaw wrote, On 04/05/2010 09:25 PM:
> On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Jonathan Oxer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 00:13 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>
>> Sorry I can't answer your other questions, but I just had a look in
>> db.log and f
