-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-17 23:24, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Il 17/05/2012 23:19,
> kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com
> ha
>> (aside) It would be very interesting to receive feedback from
>> users of the various geo-pools on whether any change
Hi.
Il 17/05/2012 23:19, kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com ha
> (aside) It would be very interesting to receive feedback from users
> of the various geo-pools on whether any changes have been noticed
> from the client side
Well, it's not really the answer to your question, but a strange
-
From: Jeffrey Johnson
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 16:15:58
To: Kristian Fiskerstrand
Cc:
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Request for reporting of upstream bandwidth capacity
On May 16, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2012
On May 16, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2012-05-16 20:22, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> On 05/16/2012 01:12 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> As upstream bandwidth capacity is one of the considerations that
>>> is taken
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2012-05-16 20:22, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 01:12 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> As upstream bandwidth capacity is one of the considerations that
>> is taken into account in [0] I would appreciate if the server
>> operators that
On 05/16/2012 01:12 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> As upstream bandwidth capacity is one of the considerations that is
> taken into account in [0] I would appreciate if the server operators
> that have not already done so would kindly email me this information
> off list (My UIDs in 0x6b0b95
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear all,
As upstream bandwidth capacity is one of the considerations that is
taken into account in [0] I would appreciate if the server operators
that have not already done so would kindly email me this information
off list (My UIDs in 0x6b0b9508 c
