On 22/03/2021 22:02, Ryan Hunt wrote:
However I’d like to see some efforts made towards:
- Rolling our SKS hacks back upstream with HP, initially this seems
stupid but HP has already put in efforts to maintain compatibility with
SKS peers.. I think a transitional SKS emulation mode that is
I did this earlier for keyserver.dobrev.eu.
On 23/03/2021 09:37, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 23/03/2021 09:19, Marcel Waldvogel wrote:
>> How about instead of claiming to be "SKS", Hockeypuck servers just
>> claim to be "Hockeypuck" (title case instead of lower case)? That
>> would be kind of a
On 23/03/2021 09:19, Marcel Waldvogel wrote:
How about instead of claiming to be "SKS", Hockeypuck servers just claim
to be "Hockeypuck" (title case instead of lower case)? That would be
kind of a "white(list) lie". They will have a red cell, but that will
not preclude their
Sounds good to
pgpkeys.eu is in the pool, however, the "Software" table cell is red.
Further investigation showed that they spell "sks" in lower case,
unlike the real SKS.
Verifying against the source code [1], the server selection code is a
blacklist: "SKS" < 1.1.6, "GnuKS", and "hockeypuck" are blacklisted
I think (c) is fine to keep the pool alive. This community has a devout
adherence to a tradition of inaction. I'm not holding my breath for
(b), but I would be delighted if someone did more than just talk about
it.
I hold that switching to hkps://keys.openpgp.org is the path forward,
and we
In addition I’ve got an interesting story, last time I seen the SKS keyserver
pool mentioned outside this group was recently when I got acquired by one of
the Linux Distros and one of the first steps they wanted all of us to do was
create PGP keys off our old corp email and submit em to the SKS
On my Mac here the GPG Keychain app now defaults to hkps://keys.openpgp.org
, Ubuntu is using their own HP servers now that are
not joining the pool, and these searches on Github is a bit depressing, lots of
commits setting the same server as default and/or removing the SKS pool:
On 22/03/2021 22:02, Ryan Hunt wrote:
I concur with the rest of the sentiment, I think its time to start
accepting HP as a replacement for SKS.. If the sks-pool will not
recognize the value of HP servers I suppose our only recourse is to
fake it for the time being.
However I’d like to see
I concur with the rest of the sentiment, I think its time to start accepting HP
as a replacement for SKS.. If the sks-pool will not recognize the value of HP
servers I suppose our only recourse is to fake it for the time being.
However I’d like to see some efforts made towards:
- Rolling our
On 22/03/2021 20:10, Martin Dobrev wrote:
c) We agree that Hockeypuck lying to be SKS is accepted in the pool,
and maybe even recommended.
I would favor (c), plus keeping the version number in the 2.x range,
so that experts still can tell the difference.
I'm already doing c) if I want to
Am 22.03.2021 um 20:41 schrieb Marcel Waldvogel:
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 22:56 +0100, Andreas Puls wrote:
I've created now a patch that just replaces in the json export
contact
with server_contact and Total with numkeys.
On 22/03/2021 19:41, Marcel Waldvogel wrote:
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 22:56 +0100, Andreas Puls wrote:
I've created now a patch that just replaces in the json export contact
with server_contact and Total with numkeys.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Marcel Waldvogel wrote:
> a) We leave it as is, Hockeypuck is fine, but just not in the pool.
> b) We create a second pool, where Hockeypuck is acceptable (and
> probably SKS as well).
> c) We agree that Hockeypuck lying to be SKS is accepted in the pool,
> and maybe even
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 22:56 +0100, Andreas Puls wrote:
>
> I've created now a patch that just replaces in the json export
> contact
> with server_contact and Total with numkeys.
> https://github.com/apuls/hockeypuck/commit/34fbdfcf73b60e6001f3770b86d8750d1c8b5385
Great, thanks! I just merged
14 matches
Mail list logo
