Re: [Sks-devel] status page

2014-04-19 Thread Kiss Gabor (Bitman)
*PLONK* Could someone please do me a kindness [...] Phil, Have you ever seen this lovely sign? :-) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Trolls.jpg Gabor ___ Sks-devel mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org

Re: [Sks-devel] status page

2014-04-19 Thread Tobias Frei
Hi, okay, I hope I don't need to explain why this e-mail caused me to remove you, Simon Lange, from my peering list. It makes me sad to see such childish behavior on a mailing list like this one. btw, ur english doesnt make u look more kewl. c y? Best regards, Tobias Frei Am 19.04.2014

Re: [Sks-devel] status page

2014-04-19 Thread Simon Lange
Agree. Ppl get personal swearing against me but dont had the kindness to read the post and try to understand it. All i did critizize was the lack of proper techdoc and that informationflow is waterdrop by waterdrop. Not a reason to insult me. If you give a fuck for poolmember's feedback then

Re: [Sks-devel] status page

2014-04-19 Thread Arnold
Hi list, Trying to be a bit more on-topic again... On 04/18/2014 10:42 PM, Simon Lange wrote: Am 18.04.2014 22:10, schrieb Martin Papik: Answering ALL host names just makes you willing to participate in any pool by default, without extra maintenance. But again, AFAIK this isn't a

Re: [Sks-devel] status page

2014-04-19 Thread Simon Lange
Agree. Ppl get personal swearing against me but dont had the kindness to read the post and try to understand it. All i did critizize was the lack of proper techdoc and that informationflow is waterdrop by waterdrop. Not a reason to insult me. If you give a fuck for poolmember's feedback then

Re: [Sks-devel] status page

2014-04-19 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Agree. Ppl get personal swearing against me but dont had the kindness to read the post and try to understand it. I have read all the posts in this thread and done my best to understand them. Some things I can't decipher, like Hust bame it. ... which is, IMO, a case study in why standard