I heard @valodim was writing a keyserver in Rust, and has made a lot of really
great progress. His code is open source and very easy to read.
On 2019-08-12T23:34:49Z (04:34PM -0700) Skip Carter sed:
On Mon, 2019-08-12 at 11:13 -0500, Daniel Roesler wrote:
There is no prominent alternative
> Fair enough. Then you're ignoring the consequences (or rather believe
> that none exist) rather than saying that the GDPR wouldn't apply to US-
> based operators.
Enforcement is the sine qua non of law. GDPR does not apply to purely
US-based operators because there is no way for the EU to
Hi,
On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 11:59 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If I, as a US citizen with no
> overseas business ties, receive a GDPR notice, I'm going to laugh and
> throw it away as it's not binding within the US. The EU can't even
> haul me into court over it.
Fair enough. Then you're
I don't believe anything you do in public has any expectation of privacy..
no moral qualms about it.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:09 AM Philihp Busby wrote:
> You should respect their right to privacy, if not for legal ones, then
> moral.
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 16:04 Ryan Hunt wrote:
>
>>
You should respect their right to privacy, if not for legal ones, then
moral.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 16:04 Ryan Hunt wrote:
> EU Can write whatever it wants down on a piece of paper, but that dont
> mean its anything more than a piece of paper to me... they have no
> authority here, I don't
EU Can write whatever it wants down on a piece of paper, but that dont mean
its anything more than a piece of paper to me... they have no authority
here, I don't recognize their authority and there is absolutely nothing
that they can do about it.. So it dont really matter if they say its
>> There are (or at least were) a large number of US-based keyserver
>> operators who were immune to the GDPR.
>
> I fail to see how this is in accordance with the GDPR.
The EU is free to claim whatever authority it wants, but until it can
enforce that authority it's bluster. If I, as a US
Hi,
On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 11:00 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> > They are!
>
> No, they're not.
I think your assessment is wrong.
>
> There are (or at least were) a large number of US-based keyserver
> operators who were immune to the GDPR.
I fail to see how this is in accordance with the
None of that is correct. The GDPR does not only apply to business
entities, it does not only apply to trade, it does not only apply to EU
citizens and it does not only apply in EU member nations. For a short
introduction, look at this article:
> They are!
No, they're not.
GDPR only applies to business entities that trade with EU citizens in EU
member nations. If a German boards a flight in Colorado to travel to
Texas, they don't get to claim GDPR protections on their tickets. It's
once the flight connects to an EU member state the
Yakamo,
Hmmm… please define/explain how servers hosted in the Republic of South Africa
is subjected to GDPR? (We have our own/similar version, but NOT GDPR)
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 15:59 , st...@yakamo.org wrote:
>
> They are!
>
> Yakamo
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:57:37 -0500
> Travis Megee
They are!
Yakamo
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 08:57:37 -0500
Travis Megee wrote:
> You're also assuming all admins are subject to GDPR.
>
> Travis
>
> On 8/13/2019 8:56 AM, st...@yakamo.org wrote:
> > Also would like to point out that this is Kristian covering his own ass not
> > the admins!
> >
> >
You're also assuming all admins are subject to GDPR.
Travis
On 8/13/2019 8:56 AM, st...@yakamo.org wrote:
> Also would like to point out that this is Kristian covering his own ass not
> the admins!
>
> Please read it again!
>
> Yakamo
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:46:39 +0200
> Tobias Frei
Also would like to point out that this is Kristian covering his own ass not the
admins!
Please read it again!
Yakamo
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:46:39 +0200
Tobias Frei wrote:
> Hi Yakamo,
>
> Have you already seen these two messages?
>
>
Yes i have, and the important key part here is that it was sent to the wrong
individual to handle it. So it was dismissed, its important to take note of
that.
Kristian has made the error in assuming this covers the admins, it does not!
That person needs to reapply and make sure they are
Hi Yakamo,
Have you already seen these two messages?
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/sks-devel/2019-02/msg00070.html
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/sks-devel/2019-03/msg00026.html
Best regards
Tobias Frei
Am 13.08.19 um 15:41 schrieb st...@yakamo.org:
Hi Boti,
SKS servers are
Hi Boti,
SKS servers are breaking the GDPR in multiple ways, its just a matter of time
before something happens.
All it would take is one motivated person and things get serious real quick.
Especially i would say right now for the admin of mattrude or any others
allowing the free distribution
In many country of EU there were a period of patience to let firms fully covers their GDPR implementation. However we have GDPR in effect last two years but authorities still had a so called "soft" penalty or no penalty just warn practice which is nearly over.In mid and longer term the penalty
ive seen it go as low as 12.
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 06:38:44 +0200 (CEST)
"Kiss Gabor (Bitman)" wrote:
> > > At this moment there is only 27 members of pool.sks-keyservers.net.
> >
> > JFR: The new negative record is 25...
>
> 21.
>
> Gabor
>
> ___
>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:34:49PM -0700, Skip Carter wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-12 at 11:13 -0500, Daniel Roesler wrote:
> I agree that it is important that there be a decentralized key sharing
> service. Given the fragility of sks and the apparent lack of
> developers willing to take up the task
20 matches
Mail list logo
