Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

Todd Fleisher wrote: > Thanks for providing these links, I'll have to check them out. I haven't used > an anonymous remailer since anon.penet.fi went dark over two decades ago > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penet_remailer You're welcome! Yes, good old penet. ;-) Regards Stefan -- box:

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

> On Aug 17, 2019, at 18:00, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Todd Fleisher wrote: > >>> On Aug 17, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Stefan Claas >> > wrote: >>> >>> Anonymity is a very important point when one likes to communicate securely >>> and anonymously! >>> >>> For that purpose

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

Todd Fleisher wrote: > > On Aug 17, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Stefan Claas > > wrote: > > > > Anonymity is a very important point when one likes to communicate securely > > and anonymously! > > > > For that purpose Anonymous Remailers with a Nym account are in service > > for

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

On 8/17/19 4:44 PM, Tobias Frei wrote: > > > On Aug 17, 2019 19:11, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Interesting! If understood correctly the advantage then would be no > changes > > in the SKS code and simply using a front-end key parser, with a > defined rule > set, right? > >

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

> On Aug 17, 2019, at 8:46 AM, Stefan Claas > wrote: > > Anonymity is a very important point when one likes to communicate securely > and anonymously! > > For that purpose Anonymous Remailers with a Nym account are in service > for many years. It requires on the users

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

On Aug 17, 2019 19:11, Stefan Claas wrote:Interesting! If understood correctly the advantage then would be no changes in the SKS code and simply using a front-end key parser, with a defined rule set, right? And false positives. And ineffectiveness against new attacks. And vulnerability through

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

brent s. wrote: > On 8/17/19 11:46 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > > The other points you have mentioned, like the signer cannot upload a key, > > well that's true but I wonder how you guys like then to solve the problem > > with uploading flooded key material to the key servers. I think you can > >

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

On 8/17/19 11:46 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > Anonymity is a very important point when one likes to communicate securely > and anonymously! > > For that purpose Anonymous Remailers with a Nym account are in service > for many years. It requires on the users side that he / she is familiar > with GPG,

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse)

brent s. wrote: > I'm going to anticipate what you're suggesting this solves - that only > key owners can upload their own key by ensuring the sender matches one > of the key's identities. There's flaws with that: > > 1.) You've now broken the ability to upload keys with no real > identifiable

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse) (WAS: Re: The pool is shrinking)

On 8/17/19 8:08 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > brent s. wrote: > >> 4.) *Real* identifiable personal information is by *no means* a >> requirement for the creation of a key, nor making it available on a >> keyserver. Granted, you're going to face some challenges at a >> traditional keysigning party,

Re: [Sks-devel] GDPR (equine corpse) (WAS: Re: The pool is shrinking)

brent s. wrote: > 4.) *Real* identifiable personal information is by *no means* a > requirement for the creation of a key, nor making it available on a > keyserver. Granted, you're going to face some challenges at a > traditional keysigning party, but simply How about email submission like we