Re: [Sks-devel] Raising the floor for the pool to SKS version 1.1.6 [was: Re: Importing ed25519 subkeys from SKS < 1.1.6]

2017-09-06 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
On 9/6/2017 6:33 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 09/07/2017 12:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > 4 >> We will (temporarily) go from 116 members of the main pool to 85 -- a >> loss of about 25%. But we also provide an incentive for those members >> to upgrade to 1.1.6, so i expect we'll

Re: [Sks-devel] Raising the floor for the pool to SKS version 1.1.6 [was: Re: Importing ed25519 subkeys from SKS < 1.1.6]

2017-09-06 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 09/07/2017 12:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > We only lose 3 members from the hkps pool, and 2 members from the > onionbalance, so i'd recommend making it a minimum there too. Just for clarification, main pool will always be a superset of both HKPS and onionbalance, so any increase in

Re: [Sks-devel] Raising the floor for the pool to SKS version 1.1.6 [was: Re: Importing ed25519 subkeys from SKS < 1.1.6]

2017-09-06 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 09/07/2017 12:16 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: 4 > We will (temporarily) go from 116 members of the main pool to 85 -- a > loss of about 25%. But we also provide an incentive for those members > to upgrade to 1.1.6, so i expect we'll make some of that back. > > We only lose 3 members from

[Sks-devel] Raising the floor for the pool to SKS version 1.1.6 [was: Re: Importing ed25519 subkeys from SKS < 1.1.6]

2017-09-06 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
(adding sks-devel to this thread since it discussies changing the minimum bar for the pool) On Wed 2017-09-06 23:46:59 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 09/06/2017 11:33 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > >> including all of the RSA and DSA subkeys. But not the original >> requested ed25519 key.