[Slackbuilds-users] [Slackbuild-users] SDL2_gfx category

2020-09-11 Thread King Beowulf
Hello, SDL2_gfx is in development, is a library, and all other SDL2_* are in libraries (as is SDL-*). Would it not be prudent to move SDL2_gfx to the development category? -Ed signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] plex-home-theater broken

2020-09-11 Thread Kent Fritz
Update: the problem is libcec, which is listed as an optional dependency in the README.  Current libcec is incompatible with plex-home-theater.  Builds OK without it. On 9/11/20 12:50 PM, Kent Fritz wrote: In testing dependencies of a library I'm updating, plex-home-theater won't build for

[Slackbuilds-users] plex-home-theater broken

2020-09-11 Thread Kent Fritz
In testing dependencies of a library I'm updating, plex-home-theater won't build for me, and not due to my changes. I haven't mailed the maintainer as there was a message here back in February looking for new maintainers of their orphaned packages.

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] discord download fails

2020-09-11 Thread Dave Woodfall
On 11/09/20 12:06, Barry Grundy put forth the proposition: > The .info file for discord: > DOWNLOAD_x86_64=" > https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.10/discord-0.0.11.deb; > Should be: > DOWNLOAD_x86_64="https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.*11* > /discord-0.0.11.deb" > (FYI: version 12 is

[Slackbuilds-users] discord download fails

2020-09-11 Thread Barry Grundy
The .info file for discord: DOWNLOAD_x86_64=" https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.10/discord-0.0.11.deb; Should be: DOWNLOAD_x86_64="https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.*11* /discord-0.0.11.deb" (FYI: version 12 is available and works fine with a version bump only) -- Barry

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] physfs 3.x breaks packages

2020-09-11 Thread CRTS
I have already contacted the maintainers for both packages. The other package was 'SDL_sound' but 'physfs' is not listed explicitly as dependency for that package. The package builds fine if 'physfs' is not installed. However, it breaks when 'physfs' is present. The offending file is:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] physfs 3.x breaks packages

2020-09-11 Thread B Watson
On 9/10/20, CRTS wrote: > Hi, > > I just had two packages break because of the new physfs 3.0.2. > The problem is that the macro '__EXPORT__' is no longer defined > the new version and must be replaced with by 'PHYSFS_DECL' by > all packages that have a dependency on 'physfs' - at least > that is