Hello,
SDL2_gfx is in development, is a library, and all other SDL2_* are in
libraries (as is SDL-*). Would it not be prudent to move SDL2_gfx to
the development category?
-Ed
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Update: the problem is libcec, which is listed as an optional dependency
in the README. Current libcec is incompatible with plex-home-theater.
Builds OK without it.
On 9/11/20 12:50 PM, Kent Fritz wrote:
In testing dependencies of a library I'm updating, plex-home-theater
won't build for
In testing dependencies of a library I'm updating, plex-home-theater
won't build for me, and not due to my changes. I haven't mailed the
maintainer as there was a message here back in February looking for new
maintainers of their orphaned packages.
On 11/09/20 12:06,
Barry Grundy put forth the proposition:
> The .info file for discord:
> DOWNLOAD_x86_64="
> https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.10/discord-0.0.11.deb;
> Should be:
> DOWNLOAD_x86_64="https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.*11*
> /discord-0.0.11.deb"
> (FYI: version 12 is
The .info file for discord:
DOWNLOAD_x86_64="
https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.10/discord-0.0.11.deb;
Should be:
DOWNLOAD_x86_64="https://dl.discordapp.net/apps/linux/0.0.*11*
/discord-0.0.11.deb"
(FYI: version 12 is available and works fine with a version bump only)
--
Barry
I have already contacted the maintainers for both packages.
The other package was 'SDL_sound' but 'physfs' is not listed
explicitly as dependency for that package. The package builds
fine if 'physfs' is not installed. However, it breaks when
'physfs' is present. The offending file is:
On 9/10/20, CRTS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had two packages break because of the new physfs 3.0.2.
> The problem is that the macro '__EXPORT__' is no longer defined
> the new version and must be replaced with by 'PHYSFS_DECL' by
> all packages that have a dependency on 'physfs' - at least
> that is