Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Please update your zopfli SlackBuild

2022-03-01 Thread Duncan Roe
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:15:26PM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > zopfli is now a Python Package on https://pypi.org/. > > zopfli changed its revision numbering scheme so PyPi has 0.1.9 but e.g. > > > diff zopfli-zopfli-1.0.0/src/zopfli/zopfli.h > >

[Slackbuilds-users] Please update your zopfli SlackBuild

2022-03-01 Thread Duncan Roe
Hi Oleg, zopfli is now a Python Package on https://pypi.org/. zopfli changed its revision numbering scheme so PyPi has 0.1.9 but e.g. > diff zopfli-zopfli-1.0.0/src/zopfli/zopfli.h > zopfli-0.1.9/zopfli/src/zopfli/zopfli.h shows 1.0.9 is newer. I suggest adjust the C build for changed

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [SlackBuildsOrg/slackbuilds] Afdkov2 (PR #1276)

2022-03-01 Thread Duncan Roe
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 06:43:59AM -0800, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > why do you put set -x when you have set -e at the middle? in scikit-build > Forgot to remove my local changes. When building, I always make up to 3 changes: 1. put 'set -x' at top 2. Change 'tar xvf' to 'tar xf' (to not

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Respect Content-disposition header always?

2022-03-01 Thread Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users
--- Original Message --- On Tuesday, March 1st, 2022 at 3:27 PM, B Watson wrote: > On 3/1/22, Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users > > slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org wrote: > > > Based on this commit: > > > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Respect Content-disposition header always?

2022-03-01 Thread B Watson
On 3/1/22, Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users wrote: > Based on this commit: > > http://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?id=59ddd1a2287f3432c9bf1e3f690c8d17c9fcef5d > > I guess it's now SBo policy that downloads must respect Content-disposition? > Or I missed that it always was? Yeah,

[Slackbuilds-users] Respect Content-disposition header always?

2022-03-01 Thread Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users
Based on this commit: http://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?id=59ddd1a2287f3432c9bf1e3f690c8d17c9fcef5d I guess it's now SBo policy that downloads must respect Content-disposition? Or I missed that it always was? (note that wget --content-disposition downloads this file as

[Slackbuilds-users] system76-power

2022-03-01 Thread John Yost
Having trouble building system76-power SlackBuild fails with tar: /home/john/SourceFiles/system/system76power/build/sysfs-class-0.1.3.crate: Cannot open: No such file or directory tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now The SlackBuild in the past would the needed rust build just to build