On Thu, 21 Sep 2023, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:
Those are not useless.
Firstly, some python packages build c-based components "behind the
scenes", and it is better to pass some CFLAGS to them.
Secondly, python packages install things into
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo writes:
>> Since sbolint (from system/sbo-maintainer-tools) is being ran on github PR
>> requests and newer versions of sbolint are catching when SLKCFLAGS and
>> LIBDIRSUFFIX are not being used, are we expected to not include them on the
>> SlackBuilds? If so, should we
I stick to the template as much as possible and think it's best just to
leave them there. They are just NOTE's and can be ignored as such, or at
least I do. It's more work to add or remove them and I like the
consistency.
I diff my builds against the template as another check (one without the
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
Since sbolint (from system/sbo-maintainer-tools) is being ran on github PR
requests and newer versions of sbolint are catching when SLKCFLAGS and
LIBDIRSUFFIX are not being used, are we expected to not include them on the
SlackBuilds? If so, should
Since sbolint (from system/sbo-maintainer-tools) is being ran on github
PR requests and newer versions of sbolint are catching when SLKCFLAGS
and LIBDIRSUFFIX are not being used, are we expected to not include them
on the SlackBuilds? If so, should we remove the entire if/then block for
the
Since sbolint (from system/sbo-maintainer-tools) is being ran on github PR
requests and newer versions of sbolint are catching when SLKCFLAGS and
LIBDIRSUFFIX are not being used, are we expected to not include them on the
SlackBuilds? If so, should we remove the entire if/then block for the ARCH
--- Original Message ---On Sunday, June 4th, 2023 at 6:34 PM,
isaac...@isaacyu1.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I now have 200+ SlackBuilds to maintain.
> Given my part-time job and my coursework, I am going to have a harder time
> maintaining it all.
>
> This is the last week in
