Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Some abandoned SlackBuilds

2023-04-24 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 4:45 PM Ryan S. Northrup ("RyNo") < north...@yellowapple.us> wrote: > Howdy! > > No objections to updating erlang-otp or elixir; I hadn't gotten around > to it only because I nowadays prefer version managers (like asdf) or > Docker/Podman containers for my own

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Some abandoned SlackBuilds

2023-04-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 8:50 AM Alexander Verbovetsky wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 08:11:52AM -0500, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > > However, rabbitmq-server-3.11.13 and rabbitmq-c-0.13.0 require > > erlang-otp-25.3 and elixir-1.14.4 to build. > > > And then eja

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Some abandoned SlackBuilds

2023-04-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- I have successfully built rabbitmq-server-3.11.13 and rabbitmq-c-0.13.0 All I had to do was bump the versions in the .info and .SlackBuild files and make minor adjustments to the files copied to /usr/doc/ However, rabbitmq-server-3.11.13 and rabbitmq-c-0.13.0 require erlang-otp-25.3 and

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] LibreOffice vs libreoffice (confusing, too vague)

2023-04-08 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 6:57 AM Andrzej Telszewski wrote: > `pkgtools` are (specifically) designed in a way that if one package > over-installs another, there is no corruption in the database. > > You just need to uninstall the old package, which can be safely done after > the new package is

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] LibreOffice vs libreoffice (confusing, too vague)

2023-04-08 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:56 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 4:54 AM marav wrote: > >> I for one, I think all binary packages should be renamed with *-bin >> >> It gives the most important information that the slackbuild is not a >> compiled

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] LibreOffice vs libreoffice (confusing, too vague)

2023-04-08 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 4:54 AM marav wrote: > I for one, I think all binary packages should be renamed with *-bin > > It gives the most important information that the slackbuild is not a > compiled version, directly in the name > No matter if there is a compiled version or not > All -- Thinking

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Some abandoned SlackBuilds

2023-03-31 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 4:35 PM Steven Voges wrote: > Hello All, > > I've been in communication with André Barboza about updating a few of his > SBo scripts. He has informed me that he will no longer be updating any of > his SlackBuild scripts and that I may take over/update any of them. > > <>

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Slackware64 15.0 + webkit2gtk version 2.40.0 + gstreamer-transcoder version 1.0

2023-03-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 9:50 AM Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > Willy / All -- > > > > Is it me ( maybe I missed an update ? ) ? > > > > Or does anyone else get a CMake Error when building webkit2gtk version > > 2.40.0 due to my gstreamer-transcoder version ? > > > >

[Slackbuilds-users] Slackware64 15.0 + webkit2gtk version 2.40.0 + gstreamer-transcoder version 1.0

2023-03-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Willy / All -- Is it me ( maybe I missed an update ? ) ? Or does anyone else get a CMake Error when building webkit2gtk version 2.40.0 due to my gstreamer-transcoder version ? This is the CMake Error from the end of my log: ``` -- Found GStreamer:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error

2023-03-04 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
M.Dinslage -- Just an update ... Thanks for today's conky-1.18.1 update The Patch from Brenden Matthews worked perfectly for compiling conky when multiple versions of lua are installed on my system. conky-1.18.1 Built, Installed and Runs fine on my Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib System. Thanks

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error

2023-02-26 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 1:06 PM Ozan Türkyılmaz wrote: > > Hello All, > > -DLUA_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib64/liblua5.3.so will fail on 32bit systems. It > should be: -DLUA_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib${LIBDIRSUFFIX}/liblua5.3.so > Oops ! Good Call Ozan :) Updated Patch attached Built and installed an still

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error

2023-02-26 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:25 AM Luiz Carlos Ramos via SlackBuilds-users < slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I could do a trick here to make it build in machines where lua 5.3 is > installed alongside lua 5.1. It is done simply adding these two lines in > the cmake invocation: >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] .info file variable expansion

2023-02-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 9:02 AM Jeremy Hansen wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2023, 6:23 AM Petar Petrov wrote: > >> I do not intend to sound nagging, but why not implement such a feature >> in order to make maintainers' job easier? >> >> -petar >> > > I can't speak on whether or not it's worth

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error

2023-02-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- I looked at the cmake file in /tmp/SBo/conky-1.18.0/ and I didn't find an obvious way to choose lua53-5.3.4-x86_64-1_SBo instead of lua-5.1.5-x86_64-1_SBo I took the easy way out and ran `removepkg lua-5.1.5-x86_64-1_SBo` ( thanks Matteo ! ) The conky-1.18.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz Package

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error

2023-02-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 8:17 AM marav wrote: > You should look on how Corrado builds lua, lua51 etc > He adds this line, foro lua53 for example: > > # Fix lua 5.3 > sed -r -e "/^LUA_(SO|A|T)=/ s/lua/lua$MAINVERSION/" -e "/^LUAC_T=/ > s/luac/luac$MAINVERSION/" -i src/Makefile > > > I have: >

[Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error

2023-02-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Matthew / all -- I am running an up-to-date Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib System I've got lua53 and imlib2 installed: lua53-5.3.4-x86_64-1_SBo imlib2-1.10.0-x86_64-1_SBo_with-docs This morning's conky update failed to compile. Or, Is it just me ? Thanks -- kjh Tail of the build log: [

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] GitHub MD5SUMs not reliabe around Jan 30th

2023-02-03 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 1:52 PM Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users < slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > Hey everybody, this actually affected one of my submissions. It's a paid > article on LWN (I don't have a membership), but it links to a GitHub blog > post and there's enough in the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [testing] Fix for zoom-linux using ARCH package build

2023-01-27 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 6:45 PM Dave wrote: > Hi all, > > Would those affected by the broken update to zoom-linux like to test > this one made using the ARCH package tarball please? > > > https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?h=zoom-linux-arch=75e76aafe5f41f72f94c3be72026067da3d5b994 >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-27 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- Ebben fixed zoom-linux BUILD=2 by switching over to the Arch Tarball Built, installed and tested. Works Here on Slackware64 15.0 +MultiLib -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-27 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:18 AM Luveh Keraph <1.41...@gmail.com> wrote: > Whatever the reason for that choice, it would seem that starting from a > Debian package would make more sense, just as is the case for many other > Slackbuilds packages. > Agreed and I believe I know enough to tell Ebben

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-27 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 7:27 AM Luveh Keraph <1.41...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's a good point: I went through a similar exercise, with similar > results, also motivated by wondering why the package used for putting > together the Slackware one is retrieved from an obscure and apparently >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-27 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
responsibility are > brought up, chances are they will not be responsive at all to direct emails > either. > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 4:43 AM Konrad J Hambrick > wrote: > >> >> so ... Has anyone contacted the maintainer ( Ebben Aries ) ? >> >> -- kjh &

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-26 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
so ... Has anyone contacted the maintainer ( Ebben Aries ) ? -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives -

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:19 AM Luveh Keraph <1.41...@gmail.com> wrote: > I may have to start doing that myself too - I have been bitten by zoom and > thunderbird in the last couple of days. > Luveh -- I can attach last week's zoom-linux-5.13.4.711-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz Package in a private email

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:59 AM Erich Ritz via SlackBuilds-users < slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > Can you try changing directory first? > > $ cd /opt/zoom-linux > $ ./ZoomLauncher > > The SlackBuild doesn't do much except extract the contents and move to > /opt/. So I don't see how

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Anybody else having problems with zoom in 15.0?

2023-01-25 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 5:57 PM Luveh Keraph <1.41...@gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, this is happening under Xfce. I do not use KDE. Besides this > forum, I am also engaging the Xfce people on this. > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 4:37 PM Luveh Keraph <1.41...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Poking around a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Trouble building graphviz 7.0.6

2023-01-16 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Duncan Roe -- graphviz built fine here too. I attached the final graphviz configure output from my build logs to this email. Maybe there is a clue in there ? One note, there are sure a lot of compiler warnings on Slackware64 15.0 ... HTH -- kjh On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 5:35 AM marav wrote:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] imlib2 notice

2023-01-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 9:03 PM Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > Hi all > > i'm planning to bump imlib2 from 1.7.4 to 1.10.0 > there are 26 other scripts that depends on imlib2, so please test with > the new imlib2 which i have pushed on separate branch: >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221231.1

2022-12-31 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks and Happy New Year to Willy and all the SBo Admins ! -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives -

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221223.1

2022-12-23 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Yes( Didier Spaier and fourtysixandtwo ), hoorex is very kool, especially `hoorex -m some-package` Question though. Dependent SBo Packages are often maintained by someone else. What are the recommended procedures when you've got a gaggle of maintainers to coordinate with ? -- kjh

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds updates still not working

2022-12-23 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks Leonard. The MD5SUM was fine this morning and google-earth builds and runs fine. -- kjh 55473878fd4369b1f8ce7268d35ead53 google-earth-pro-stable_7.3.6_amd64.deb ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds updates still not working

2022-12-18 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- I keep a local `git clone` of 15.0 here on my box and use a very old, hand-rolled script and the .info files to construct script-wrappers to build SBo Packages. My local build-system only had an issue with google-earth where there was an MD5SUM mismatch in the google-earth.info File. I

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221217.1

2022-12-17 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Oops, sorry. I missed that. -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ -

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221217.1

2022-12-17 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
bedlam -- Not yet. -- kjh google-earth-pro-stable_7.3.6_amd64.deb: FAILED md5sum: WARNING: 1 computed checksum did NOT match These are the specifics: The downloaded file: # md5sum google-earth-pro-stable_7.3.6_amd64.deb 55473878fd4369b1f8ce7268d35ead53 google-earth-pro-stable_7.3.6_amd64.deb

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221217.1

2022-12-17 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks for the clarification, marav. -- kjh > ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221217.1

2022-12-17 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
marav -- I am curious ... are you saying that the tools you mentioned care about the content of the Pages at SlackBuild.org ? The SQLAlchemy.info and SQLAlchemy.SlackBuild files are consistent ( Version 1.4.45 ) and DOWNLOAD and MD5SUM are correct in SQLAlchemy.info The latest version

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] wxWidgets-3.2.x dependencies

2022-12-09 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks Willy ! -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ -

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] wxWidgets-3.2.x dependencies

2022-12-09 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Willy -- Did you remove libmspack or did you remove REQUIRES="libmspack" from wxWidgets.info and -DwxUSE_LIBMSPACK=ON from wxWidgets.SlackBuild ? Thanks. -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hdf5 version 1.12.2 -vs- version 1.10.6

2022-10-29 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
: > I built it in this order: > > libeac / hdf5 / geos / proj / gdal > Le 29/10/2022 à 14:06, Konrad J Hambrick a écrit : > > Well, dang. > > I've got some research to do. > > Thanks marav ! > > -- kjh > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 6:48 AM marav wrote: &

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hdf5 version 1.12.2 -vs- version 1.10.6

2022-10-29 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Greg -- Yes, that was it ( netcdf -- see above ) ! I've got some rebuilding to do this morning :) -- kjh On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 7:34 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > marav -- > > Thanks a zillion ! > > I also have gdal optional REQUIRE netcdf installed and netcdf also > REQUI

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hdf5 version 1.12.2 -vs- version 1.10.6

2022-10-29 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
marav -- Thanks a zillion ! I also have gdal optional REQUIRE netcdf installed and netcdf also REQUIRES hdf5. gdal was failing when it 'hit' netcdf with the unresolved hdf5.so.200 ! Thanks again ! -- kjh On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 7:06 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > Well, dang. > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hdf5 version 1.12.2 -vs- version 1.10.6

2022-10-29 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
t; # ... > ... > *Slackware package /tmp/gdal-3.5.2-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz created.* > > Without any addition > > Cheers > Le 29/10/2022 à 13:09, Konrad J Hambrick a écrit : > > Matteo -- > > Several of my SBo's that REQUIRE HDF5 fail to run this morning. > > I be

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221029.1

2022-10-29 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Fernando -- I reported this privately to Willy earlier this morning. This is the punch line: tor-browser VERSION 11.5.6 is available today as: https://dist.torproject.org/torbrowser/11.5.6/tor-browser-linux64-11.5.6_en-US.tar.xz and

[Slackbuilds-users] hdf5 version 1.12.2 -vs- version 1.10.6

2022-10-29 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Matteo -- Several of my SBo's that REQUIRE HDF5 fail to run this morning. I believe it's because HDF5 Version 1.12.2 introduced incompatible API Changes compared to the previous version HDF5 1.10.6 See this link( HDF5 Version 1.12.2 API Compatibility Macros ): Migrating from HDF5 1.10 to HDF5

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] syntax error in ghostwriter.info

2022-10-15 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks for Updating ghostwriter.SlackBuild Andrew and SBo Maintainers. Megan Conkle has been very busy in the Ghostwriter Master and many-if-not-all the dead links have been fixed. In addition, there is a brand new Ghostwriter HomePage. Thanks for all the hard work on Ghostwriter Megan ! I

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] syntax error in ghostwriter.info

2022-10-11 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Edit: Thanks again ANDREW, Greg and Dave ( sorry Andrew, and thanks for Ghostwriter ( I use it A LOT )) On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 5:17 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > All -- > > I reported the 404 Errors due to the old wereturtle links at Bug # 460212 > - Ghostwriter Documentatio

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] syntax error in ghostwriter.info

2022-10-11 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
n Greg and Dave. -- kjh On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:00 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > Thanks for the Update Greg. > > -- kjh > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:57 AM Konrad J Hambrick > wrote: > >> Thanks Dave. >> >> The patches you sent me last week did work and I was

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] syntax error in ghostwriter.info

2022-10-10 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks for the Update Greg. -- kjh On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:57 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > Thanks Dave. > > The patches you sent me last week did work and I was able to rebuild and > run ghostwriter using your patches. > > However, the Source Code and Documentation are

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] syntax error in ghostwriter.info

2022-10-10 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
at 8:54 AM Dave W. wrote: > On 10/10/22 05:21, > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 9:27 AM Greg' Ar Tourter > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > There is an extra " at the beginning of the line containing >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] syntax error in ghostwriter.info

2022-10-10 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 9:27 AM Greg' Ar Tourter wrote: > Hi > > There is an extra " at the beginning of the line containing MD5SUM_x86_64 > in the ghostwriter info file that should not be there. > > Cheers > > Greg > Greg -- One of the Devs ( Dave W ) was working on the issue last week but

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] fltk

2022-10-02 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 5:10 AM William PC wrote: > Hi, > > I'm preparing a package that uses fltk. > I installed the version from slackbuilds.org > Then I tried to do a slackware clean-system > and the package doesn't show up. > As I imagined the package is at Slackware 15, there is why >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-02 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
No Worries Dave. Other than the ghostwriter.info corrections, I believe all the changes will have to happen in the KDE Repo. -- kjh > > ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 3:00 PM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W. wrote: > >> >> On 01/10/22 13:18, >> Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick >> > <> D

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W. wrote: > > On 01/10/22 13:18, > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 11:07 AM Dave W. wrote: > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 11:07 AM Dave W. wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Up for testing is a patch that (blindly) changes all the homepage >> links in the source folder. I've also sent a copy to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20221001.1

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 6:46 AM Ruben Schuller wrote: > Hi list, > > 2022-10-01 Willy Sudiarto Raharjo : > > > office/ghostwriter: Updated for version 2.1.6 > > the info file of ghostwriter is broken: > > "MD5SUM_x86_64="7a46b3b1043d33e835c2e1c38d51191c" > > note the " at the beginning of the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] New libsvm.SlackBuild Questions

2022-09-13 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thank you for the quick reply, Erich I like your /usr/libexec/libsvm/ idea ! I'll play around with it a bit. Thanks again. -- kjh ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

[Slackbuilds-users] New libsvm.SlackBuild Questions

2022-09-13 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- I have libsvm.SlackBuild about ready to submit but I've got some questions first. LIBSVM's HOME is https://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/ and it comes with a Makefile but there is no install target so I manually install the files into 'the usual' subdirectories under

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] netcdf package maintenance

2022-08-26 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
You've got my vote. Greg :) I would love to see a newer version of netcdf and the ReQUIRES. Thanks. -- kjh On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 6:02 AM Greg' Ar Tourter wrote: > Hi > > I was wondering if it would be ok if I updated netcdf again or took over > its maintenance for now. I have realised that

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-06-04 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 4:28 PM Arnaud via SlackBuilds-users < slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > On 22/05/22 14:46, > > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > > All -- > > > I emailed the maintainer on May 12 but have received no re

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Github project download links

2022-05-27 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 3:02 AM marav wrote: > Le 27/05/2022 à 09:45, Franzen via SlackBuilds-users a écrit : > > Hi, > > i can't find the link to Dave's writeup about how to get correct links > from github projects for the .info-file. > Is there a link somewhere on https://slackbuilds.org/ for

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-23 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 4:00 AM Ozan Türkyılmaz wrote: > Pzt, 2022-05-23 tarihinde 03:31 -0500 saatinde, Konrad J Hambrick yazdı > > > I have chroot to test in clean environment. I recommend it. Easy to > > > install > > > and no performance hit from emulation. &

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-23 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 11:43 PM Ozan Türkyılmaz wrote: > Paz, 2022-05-22 tarihinde 17:27 -0500 saatinde, Konrad J Hambrick > yazdı: > > > > I don't have another Machine for testing non-MultiLib. > > > I have chroot to test in clean environment. I reco

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
DevIL.SlackBuild which includes the new cmake flag: -DIL_USE_DXTC_NVIDIA=NO It builds fine and now I'll test it. The punchline: I believe all we need to do is add -DIL_USE_DXTC_NVIDIA=NO to the cmake command in DevIL.SlackBuild Thanks -- kjh On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:55 PM Konrad J Hambrick wrote

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:42 PM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 4:33 PM Dave Woodfall > wrote: > >> > On 22/05/22 14:46, >> > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: >> > > All -- >> > > I emailed the maintai

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 4:33 PM Dave Woodfall wrote: > > On 22/05/22 14:46, > > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > > All -- > > > I emailed the maintainer on May 12 but have received no reply. > > > Below is the email I sent. &g

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 3:35 PM Dave Woodfall wrote: > On 22/05/22 14:46, > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > All -- > > I emailed the maintainer on May 12 but have received no reply. > > This is the right place, usually we accept patches as attachm

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 4:28 PM Arnaud via SlackBuilds-users < slackbuilds-users@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > On 22/05/22 14:46, > > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > > All -- > > > I emailed the maintainer on May 12 but have received no re

[Slackbuilds-users] DevIL - Does not Compile when nvidia-texture-tools is installed

2022-05-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- I emailed the maintainer on May 12 but have received no reply. Below is the email I sent. The Punchline is that the DevIL SBo will not compile on my Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib System when the nvidia-texture-tools SBo is installed. The simplest fix is to turn off nvidia-texture-tools

[Slackbuilds-users] github URL - Content Disposition Part 3

2022-05-06 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- I've got still more github-related questions. The gmic project ( https://gmic.eu/ ) was reorganized between versions 2 and 3. The gmic version 2.9.4 source code included the source for the zart subproject, but now zart is in a separate github Project ( URL =

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-05-02 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:37 AM Ozan Türkyılmaz wrote: > Pzt, 2022-05-02 tarihinde 11:19 -0400 saatinde, B. Watson yazdı: > > Machine translations have improved in recent years. I wonder if any > > of > > the big desktop environments (gnome/kde/etc) have given any thought > > to > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-05-02 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:20 AM B. Watson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2 May 2022, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > > One thing I've noticed is that .desktop internationalization among the > SBo > > Packages is spotty at best. > > > > This would be one way to start

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-05-02 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 12:09 PM B. Watson wrote: > > > On Sun, 1 May 2022, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > > Question: is there a better way ( or a recommended way ) to enter long, > > formatted > > lists of text like NEW_CAT in the code snippet below ? > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-05-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 5:10 AM Dave Woodfall wrote: > On 01/05/22 04:58, > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > > Question: is there a better way ( or a recommended way ) to enter long, > > formatted > > lists of text like NEW_CAT in the code snippet b

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-05-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 4:11 PM Dave Woodfall wrote: > On 30/04/22 15:23, > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > All -- > > Been playing with the OTB.SlackBuild and OTB Version 8.0.0 > > I am getting clean builds and the program works as expected. > &g

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-04-30 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 4:35 PM B. Watson wrote: > > > On Sat, 30 Apr 2022, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > > Running test: 35-desktop...usr/share/applications/monteverdi.desktop: > hint: > > value "Education;Science;ImageProcessing;Geography;Qt;" for key >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-04-30 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 4:11 PM Dave Woodfall wrote: > On 30/04/22 15:23, > Konrad J Hambrick put forth the proposition: > > All -- > > Been playing with the OTB.SlackBuild and OTB Version 8.0.0 > > I am getting clean builds and the program works as expected. > &g

[Slackbuilds-users] Proper Method to Categorize Desktop Apps

2022-04-30 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- Been playing with the OTB.SlackBuild and OTB Version 8.0.0 I am getting clean builds and the program works as expected. `sbolint` returns no errors or warnings, but when I run sbopkglint /tmp/OTB-8.0.0-x86_64-1_SBo.tgz I get a hint: Running test:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20200430.1

2022-04-30 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:17 AM Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > People have been asking about how to get a consistent filename from > Github URL. Dave has written a detailed HOWTO and you can read it here > https://slackbuilds.org/GITHUB_URLs.txt > > Sat Apr 30 06:54:56

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Please your support

2022-04-18 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sun, Apr 17, 2022 at 10:59 PM Klaatu wrote: > I don't find this spammy. Were he a stranger, I would feel differently, > but Dimitris maintains several SlackBuild scripts: > > https://slackbuilds.org/advsearch.php?q=Zlatanidis=maint > > He also produces a very useful tool `slpkg` (among

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SBo 15.0 git kig

2022-04-08 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
NP B. Watson ! I've mapped multimedir to multimedia in my report until it can be fixed :) Thanks for all the hard work All'y'All ! -- kjh On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 3:38 PM B. Watson wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2022, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > > I am seeing that multim

[Slackbuilds-users] SBo 15.0 git kig

2022-04-08 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Willy -- Just a minor head's up ... I post-process the output of `git log` to write a periodic SBo update report. I am seeing that multimedia is misspelled as multimedir on the pipe-viewer entry. But that could be my simplistic LC_ALL=C environment :) Thanks for all the SlackBuilds ! -- kjh

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Xerces-c source and hdf5

2022-04-07 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Bouboulov -- Just to add a me too ... The original DOWNLOAD=" http://archive.apache.org/dist/xerces/c/3/sources/xerces-c-3.2.3.tar.gz; and MD5SUM="a5fa4d920fce31c9ca3bfef241644494" both worked for me just now. And for good measure, although I had already built and installed hdf5, I checked the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] gdal tarball possibly changed layout

2022-04-07 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
on the Mailing List. Maybe someone is interested in adopting OTB ? -- kjh On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 8:08 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > Let me think about Greg. > > OTB works for me now when I need it. > > And I would hate to take on an SB then abandon it immediately ... > > -- kjh

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] gdal tarball possibly changed layout

2022-04-06 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
aintained > as Benjamin unfortunately has stopped maintaining his builds. So if you > feel like taking it up, I suspect it is free. > > Greg > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 17:23, Konrad J Hambrick > wrote: > >> Thanks Greg. >> >> Worked Great ! >> >&

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] gdal tarball possibly changed layout

2022-04-05 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks Greg. Worked Great ! OTB ( montevideo ) is running as expected without a rebuild with gdal 3.4.2 -- kjh On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 10:53 AM Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > Thanks Greg ! > > Building gdal 3.4.2 now :) > > -- kjh > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 6:47 PM Greg

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] gdal tarball possibly changed layout

2022-04-05 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thanks Greg ! Building gdal 3.4.2 now :) -- kjh On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 6:47 PM Greg' Ar Tourter wrote: > Hi Luis, > > I submitted a fix a few days ago for this. in the meantime use the source > url off the slackbuild website: >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] What if we `source`d the version number

2022-01-10 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Klaatu -- That's pretty much what I do ( source $PROGRAM.info ) in my do-SlackBuild.$PRGNAM scripts. But I do that in a wrapper-script that invokes the standard SlackBuild. The Code below is auto-generated by a get-SB-pkg script ( example: get-SB-pkg intel-microcode ) As you can see, the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20190217.1

2019-02-17 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
What Dave said. No worries Willy ! Thanks for all you do when you find time to do it :) -- kjh On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 1:28 PM David O'Shaughnessy wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2019, at 7:07 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > > sorry for the delay for this batch, due to some real life work :) > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20190126.1

2019-01-26 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thank you to B. Watson and Andrew Clemons for stepping up ! -- kjh On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 7:15 PM Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Over the year, we have seen our community is growing constantly and many > (new) maintainers stepping up to keep our

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hoorex-0.6.4 and tty control Strings

2018-09-22 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Christoph Willing < > chris.will...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > >> On 17/9/18 9:11 pm, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:46 AM, C

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hoorex-0.6.4 and tty control Strings

2018-09-18 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Christoph Willing < chris.will...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > On 17/9/18 9:11 pm, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Christoph Willing > > mailto:chris.will...@iinet.net.au>> wrote: > > > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] hoorex-0.6.4 and tty control Strings

2018-09-17 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Christoph Willing < chris.will...@iinet.net.au> wrote: > On 17/9/18 8:42 am, Christoph Willing wrote: > > On 16/9/18 8:10 pm, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > [snip] > > > > A problem I will have with the python curses solution is how to

[Slackbuilds-users] hoorex-0.6.4 and tty control Strings

2018-09-16 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Chris -- I've been using hoorex in several scripts to generate build / install lists for SBo Programs. This week's hoorex version 0.6.4 broke my SBo Update scripts. Specifically, it is the newly introduced, ANSI termcap / terminfo strings in the # OUTPUT section ( lines 284- 304 ) that cause

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] MD5 hash sums

2018-08-24 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
All -- IMO ( and ITO of other SBo Customers ), The MD5SUM= field in the .info file is to verify that the DOWNLOAD= files that you downloaded the same files that the Maintainer downloaded. Nothing more than that. It is not for security -- the SBo Maintainer cannot guarantee that the source files

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] ganttproject

2018-08-04 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Rich Shepard wrote: > On Sat, 4 Aug 2018, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > I didn't know about ganttproject. >> It seems to work fine ( but now I need to learn how to use it ) >> > > Konrad, > > Slightly off-topic, bu

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] weekly bad download report

2018-08-04 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Thank you B Watson. That is a great service that you and Darren provide ! I'll look for your weekly report before I report any MD5SUM or DOWNLOAD issues :) -- kjh On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 4:29 AM, B Watson wrote: > On 8/4/18, Konrad J Hambrick wrote: > > Nice report there B Watson.

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] ganttproject

2018-08-04 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Ekin ( and David )-- Very Kool ! I didn't know about ganttproject. I learn all kinds of useful things on the slackbuilds-users mailing list ! I just now built and installed ganttproject on Slackware64 14.2 + Multilib. It seems to work fine ( but now I need to learn how to use it ) One thing

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] weekly bad download report

2018-08-04 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Nice report there B Watson. I assume you're running a script that downloads each non-NULL DOWNLOAD= ( and DOWNLOAD64= ) and then checking the corresponding MD5SUMS ? Thank you ! -- kjh On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 3:48 AM, B Watson wrote: > Failed downloads from tonight's sbosrcarch run: > > ===

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] youtube-dl DOWNLOAD= moved ?

2018-07-14 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
Dimitris -- The DOWNLOAD= URI in this week's youtube-dl.info was also incorrect. When I 'found' and downloaded the File, the MD5SUM= in the youtube-dl.info File was OK and I was able to build a working youtube-gl version 2018-07-04 Ed -- Yes, the URI for the youtube-dl file is predictable.

  1   2   >