Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

I Still love it On 29 March 2017 at 21:18, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > 2017-03-29 19:03 GMT+02:00 King Beowulf : >> "So let it be written. So let it be done." > > isn't that a quote from "Creeping Death"? >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-29 20:10 GMT+02:00 King Beowulf : > On 03/29/2017 10:18 AM, Matteo Bernardini wrote: >> 2017-03-29 19:03 GMT+02:00 King Beowulf : >>> "So let it be written. So let it be done." >> >> isn't that a quote from "Creeping Death"? >> > > Dang kids

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

On 03/29/2017 10:18 AM, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > 2017-03-29 19:03 GMT+02:00 King Beowulf : >> "So let it be written. So let it be done." > > isn't that a quote from "Creeping Death"? > Dang kids these days don't know their cinematic history:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-29 19:03 GMT+02:00 King Beowulf : > "So let it be written. So let it be done." isn't that a quote from "Creeping Death"? ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

On 03/27/2017 04:35 PM, David Spencer wrote: >> Could we hold off on this for all nvidia-* scripts? The current design, >> and Nvidia's habit of moving, adding, and renaming libs will cause a lot >> of failures and thus bug reports. I'd rather have a script fail than >> have it create a package

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

> Could we hold off on this for all nvidia-* scripts? The current design, > and Nvidia's habit of moving, adding, and renaming libs will cause a lot > of failures and thus bug reports. I'd rather have a script fail than > have it create a package that might bugger of someone's system. I've got

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

On 03/25/2017 07:50 PM, David Spencer wrote: > > * Allow VERSION override > > It should be possible to try to run the SlackBuild script with a > different version, for example 'VERSION=1.2.3 ./script.SlackBuild' > But some really old scripts had never been updated to support this > properly, so

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

>>> always possible that we have broken something, so please let us know if >>> you find any problems >> Hi!, >> >> gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... > gnuradio is second level dep of gqrx-sdr since it's a first level dep of > gr-osmosdr > > Yes exactly! Sorry for the noise...:(

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

>> always possible that we have broken something, so please let us know if >> you find any problems > Hi!, > > gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... gnuradio is second level dep of gqrx-sdr since it's a first level dep of gr-osmosdr -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

> gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... > > Thanks! Hi! Done :D Thanks for the update -D. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives -

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

> It is > always possible that we have broken something, so please let us know if > you find any problems Hi!, gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... Thanks! ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

On 3/26/17, Didier Spaier wrote: > find /usr/share/applications -name "*.desktop" -exec desktop-file-validate > '{}' ';' > show that some .desktop files also need attention in the distribution > itself. Very true. Pat's philosophy is to let upstream worry about it... but, the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

Le 26/03/2017 à 15:28, B Watson a écrit : > ...and the desktop-file-validate command is your friend :) I don't have a Slackware-current at hand, but running find /usr/share/applications -name "*.desktop" -exec desktop-file-validate '{}' ';' show that some .desktop files also need attention in

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

On 3/26/17, Petar Petrov wrote: > Are there some new rules about .desktop files? I have not been > following the mailing list lately, so I may have missed sth... The rules about .desktop files aren't new, they've been here all along:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

nevermind my previous email, i just found the second email by idlemoor... 2017-03-26 5:50 GMT+03:00 David Spencer : > Ok, I'm going to explain some of the small fixes we just made, but you > are welcome to delete this email if you're not interested. > > > > * Make

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

hi to all. first of all, thanks for the hard work on doing all these cleanups. Are there some new rules about .desktop files? I have not been following the mailing list lately, so I may have missed sth... -petar 2017-03-26 4:53 GMT+03:00 David Spencer : > Hello again

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

Ok, I'm going to explain some of the small fixes we just made, but you are welcome to delete this email if you're not interested. * Make .desktop validate freedesktop.org has standards for .desktop files and a validator. We have run the validator on all the .desktop files in our repository

[Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

Hello again everybody! Here is the second public update that we promised you yesterday. In this update there are 912 commits. A few of them are normal updates and fixes, but the majority of them are small tidy-ups and fixes to scripts that were prepared by B Watson. Thanks to him for the hard