On 2/13/22 13:11, B Watson wrote:
> On 2/4/22, King Beowulf wrote:
>> Hello admins,
>>
>> wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
>> hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview, we
>> can:
>>
>> 1. Drop it from SBo.
>> 2. Put it up for gra
On 2/4/22, King Beowulf wrote:
> Hello admins,
>
> wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
> hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview, we
> can:
>
> 1. Drop it from SBo.
> 2. Put it up for grabs for someone to take over maintainership.
Hello admins,
wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and hasn't
been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview, we can:
1. Drop it from SBo.
2. Put it up for grabs for someone to take over maintainership.
-Ed
On 2/7/22, King Beowulf wrote:
>
> Thanks, that'll be spiffy. All my other stuff is wxGTK3, so usually not
> an issue there. Only wxcam needs the older wxPython. pain in the rump
> to keep track. If you could tweak wxcam so I can see how it's done
> that'd be great.
For wxcam, it was dead simpl
On 2/7/22 07:58, B Watson wrote:
> On 2/6/22, King Beowulf wrote:
>
>> Sweet. Forgot about that one. My issue turn out to be the order of
>> wxPython and wxGTK3 install and that stupid wx-config symlink.
>
> There are ways to write build scripts so they don't depend on the
> symlink. How exac
On 2/6/22, King Beowulf wrote:
> Sweet. Forgot about that one. My issue turn out to be the order of
> wxPython and wxGTK3 install and that stupid wx-config symlink.
There are ways to write build scripts so they don't depend on the
symlink. How exactly you do it depends on how the build proces
On 2/5/22 22:37, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote:
>> wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
>> hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview,
>> we can:
>>
>> 1. Drop it from SBo.
>> 2. Put it up for grabs for someone to take over as maintainer
> wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
> hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview,
> we can:
>
> 1. Drop it from SBo.
> 2. Put it up for grabs for someone to take over as maintainer.
Someone send a report in LQ and Ponce seems alrea
On 2/4/22 11:30, B Watson wrote:
> On 2/4/22, King Beowulf wrote:
>> (oops sent this via the wrong email address)
>>
>> Hello admins,
>>
>> wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
>> hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview,
>> we can:
On 2/4/22, King Beowulf wrote:
> (oops sent this via the wrong email address)
>
> Hello admins,
>
> wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
> hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview,
> we can:
Huh? It compiles just fine.
Most likely
(oops sent this via the wrong email address)
Hello admins,
wxcam-1.1 hasn't compiled (at leas not here) on Slackare for awhile and
hasn't been updated upstream since 2011. Since I switched to guvcview,
we can:
1. Drop it from SBo.
2. Put it up for grabs for someone to take over as maintainer.
11 matches
Mail list logo
