Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread David Spencer
Hi Ryan, everybody -- I think I might need 'burp' soon, maybe I should volunteer for that if nobody else does? Thanks for the excellent record-keeping! -D. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
>> always possible that we have broken something, so please let us know if >> you find any problems > Hi!, > > gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... gnuradio is second level dep of gqrx-sdr since it's a first level dep of gr-osmosdr -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread Panagiotis Nikolaou
>>> always possible that we have broken something, so please let us know if >>> you find any problems >> Hi!, >> >> gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... > gnuradio is second level dep of gqrx-sdr since it's a first level dep of > gr-osmosdr > > Yes exactly! Sorry for the noise...:(

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread David Spencer
> gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... > > Thanks! Hi! Done :D Thanks for the update -D. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives -

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread King Beowulf
On 03/25/2017 07:50 PM, David Spencer wrote: > > * Allow VERSION override > > It should be possible to try to run the SlackBuild script with a > different version, for example 'VERSION=1.2.3 ./script.SlackBuild' > But some really old scripts had never been updated to support this > properly, so

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Sage build fail

2017-03-26 Thread JCA
I tried on yet another system, again 64-bit 14.2, this time with 6 GB RAM and 3 GB swap, running XFCE but nothing else, and I am getting the same result. I'll try again, this time without X running. On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > I

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Sage build fail

2017-03-26 Thread Christoph Willing
On 27/03/17 12:52, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: > I tried on yet another system, again 64-bit 14.2, this time with 6 GB RAM >> and 3 GB swap, running XFCE but nothing else, and I am getting the same >> result. I'll try again, this time without X running. > > Just to make sure to run a complete

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread B Watson
On 3/24/17, Ryan P.C. McQuen wrote: > http://urchlay.naptime.net/~urchlay/src/ryanbuilds.txt Above link has been updated to reflect changes from this thread. > Thank you already for taking over more than 100 of my builds! Whatever is > left after the next public

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Sage build fail

2017-03-26 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> I have tried to build the latest version of Sage (7.5.1) with sbopkg in two > Slackware64 14.2 systems; they are both 64-bit systems, one of them > vanilla, the other multilib. I get exactly the same error trace in both. > The first line seem to suggest that the system ran out of memory, but one

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Sage build fail

2017-03-26 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
I tried on yet another system, again 64-bit 14.2, this time with 6 GB RAM > and 3 GB swap, running XFCE but nothing else, and I am getting the same > result. I'll try again, this time without X running. Just to make sure to run a complete installation of Slackware{64}-14.2 with the latest patch

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread Ryan P.C. McQuen
Just realized libraries/qutepart is a dependency for enki, so I'll take that too. Thanks for catching that, it's yours! -Ryan [ryanpcmcquen.org] ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

[Slackbuilds-users] Sage build fail

2017-03-26 Thread JCA
I have tried to build the latest version of Sage (7.5.1) with sbopkg in two Slackware64 14.2 systems; they are both 64-bit systems, one of them vanilla, the other multilib. I get exactly the same error trace in both. The first line seem to suggest that the system ran out of memory, but one of them

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread B Watson
On 3/26/17, Didier Spaier wrote: > find /usr/share/applications -name "*.desktop" -exec desktop-file-validate > '{}' ';' > show that some .desktop files also need attention in the distribution > itself. Very true. Pat's philosophy is to let upstream worry about it... but, the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread Panagiotis Nikolaou
> It is > always possible that we have broken something, so please let us know if > you find any problems Hi!, gqrx-sdr missing gnuradio as a dependency... Thanks! ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Sage build fail

2017-03-26 Thread B Watson
The following is pretty generic advice, doesn't relate specifically to sage, but here goes anyway: On 3/26/17, JCA <1.41...@gmail.com> wrote: > The first line seem to suggest that the system ran out of memory, but one > of them comes with 3 GB of RAM, and the other with 8 GB of RAM Have you got

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread Didier Spaier
Le 26/03/2017 à 15:28, B Watson a écrit : > ...and the desktop-file-validate command is your friend :) I don't have a Slackware-current at hand, but running find /usr/share/applications -name "*.desktop" -exec desktop-file-validate '{}' ';' show that some .desktop files also need attention in

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread B Watson
On 3/26/17, Petar Petrov wrote: > Are there some new rules about .desktop files? I have not been > following the mailing list lately, so I may have missed sth... The rules about .desktop files aren't new, they've been here all along:

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread Petar Petrov
hi to all. first of all, thanks for the hard work on doing all these cleanups. Are there some new rules about .desktop files? I have not been following the mailing list lately, so I may have missed sth... -petar 2017-03-26 4:53 GMT+03:00 David Spencer : > Hello again

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread Jason Graham
Good catch. Yep I'll also take ip2location-c I should check if any deps are in Ryan's list for the other packages I picked up... Best, J On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:52 AM, B Watson wrote: > On 3/25/17, Jason Graham wrote: > > > ipv6calc > > You might

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread Ryan P.C. McQuen
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 05:55:45 -0700 B Watson yalh...@gmail.com wrote On 3/24/17, Ryan P.C. McQuen ryanpcmcq...@member.fsf.org wrote: http://urchlay.naptime.net/~urchlay/src/ryanbuilds.txt Above link has been updated to reflect changes from this thread. Thank

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread Ryan P.C. McQuen
On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 06:15:01 -0700 Jason Graham jgra...@gmail.com wrote Good catch. Yep I'll also take ip2location-c Excellent choice, now we are at 37! -Ryan [ryanpcmcquen.org] ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Only 68 builds left!

2017-03-26 Thread B Watson
On 3/25/17, Jason Graham wrote: > ipv6calc You might also want to take network/ip2location-c since it's an optional dep of ipv6calc. ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Updates - 20170326.1

2017-03-26 Thread Petar Petrov
nevermind my previous email, i just found the second email by idlemoor... 2017-03-26 5:50 GMT+03:00 David Spencer : > Ok, I'm going to explain some of the small fixes we just made, but you > are welcome to delete this email if you're not interested. > > > > * Make