Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk and sbopkg

2018-04-10 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2018-04-10 16:48 GMT+02:00 JCA <1.41...@gmail.com>: > I believe that Oracle's jdk tarball cannot be downloaded without human > intervention - i.e. one must agree to whatever it is that Oracle specifies, > before the tarball can be downloaded. This is not a big deal for > Slackbuilds, but it is a

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk and sbopkg

2018-04-10 Thread JCA
OK, that works well enough. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Matteo Bernardini < matteo.bernard...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-04-10 16:48 GMT+02:00 JCA <1.41...@gmail.com>: > > I believe that Oracle's jdk tarball cannot be downloaded without human > > intervention - i.e. one must agree to

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk and sbopkg

2018-04-10 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
>   I see multiple versions of most packages in /var/cache/sbopkg. Do I need > to retain the earlier ones for any reason? Should this directory be cleaned > up periodically? use sbopkg -o -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk and sbopkg

2018-04-10 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Matteo Bernardini wrote: you just have to download the correct tarball and then place it under /var/cache/sbopkg, then you can build it fine. Matteo, I see multiple versions of most packages in /var/cache/sbopkg. Do I need to retain the earlier ones for any reason?

[Slackbuilds-users] jdk and sbopkg

2018-04-10 Thread JCA
I believe that Oracle's jdk tarball cannot be downloaded without human intervention - i.e. one must agree to whatever it is that Oracle specifies, before the tarball can be downloaded. This is not a big deal for Slackbuilds, but it is a pain for sbopkg. In fact, it is a bit of a pain for any

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] jdk and sbopkg

2018-04-10 Thread Rich Shepard
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: use sbopkg -o Thanks, Willy. I should have read the man page again. My apologies for not doing so before writing. Rich ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] wmcliphist glitch under fluxbox

2018-04-10 Thread Sebastien BALLET
Hello, Even if the first patch I sent is okl, I think it is better to use the (new) attached version instead. Note that the attached patch allows to use wmcliphist under fluxbox, and has no side effect when wmcliphist is run under windowmaker. -- SeB 2018-04-04 16:32 GMT+02:00 Sebastien BALLET