[Slackbuilds-users] new nvidia 361.28 ready for testing.

2016-03-12 Thread King Beowulf
Attached is a diff against 14.2 master (based on about 15:00 pm PST USA) for the newest nvidia binary driver 361.28, or you can get the files here: (fast) http://www.koenigcomputers.com/sbo-testing/ (slow) http://www.linuxgalaxy.org/files/sbo-testing/ archive tarballs are in the (slow) link. So

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Error while creating nvidia-legacy340-driver package on -current

2016-03-12 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> I've already removed the nvidia-installer section from the scripts. Just > need to get it to the SBo admins. you can send the updated tarball or patch to this list -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Error while creating nvidia-legacy340-driver package on -current

2016-03-12 Thread King Beowulf
On 03/12/2016 03:42 PM, Luís Fernando Carvalho Cavalheiro wrote: > Dear friend > > Looks like I found by myself how to solve this issue. Reading > nvidia-legacy340-driver.SlackBuild script, I found a commentary that stated > nvidia-installer isn't needed by this SlackBuild. So, I commented out

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Call for Bug Fixes, Patches, etc

2016-03-12 Thread Luís Fernando Carvalho Cavalheiro
I'd stick with find solution. If a source has more files than chmod can handle (or perhaps bash can do, since there may be a limitation on * expansion), it would fail to set desired permissions to files. Em 13 de 03 de 2016 às 08:11:12T+0700, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Call for Bug Fixes, Patches, etc

2016-03-12 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
>> Are you opposed to this solution? >> >> find -L . \ >> \( -perm 777 -o -perm 775 -o -perm 750 -o -perm 711 -o -perm 555 \ >> -o -perm 511 \) -print0 | \ >> xargs -0 chmod 755 >> find -L . \ >> \( -perm 666 -o -perm 664 -o -perm 640 -o -perm 600 -o -perm 444 \ >> -o -perm 440 -o -perm

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Call for Bug Fixes, Patches, etc

2016-03-12 Thread Erik Hanson
On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 00:23:17 + "Ryan P.C. McQuen" wrote: > Erik, > > Are you opposed to this solution? > > find -L . \ > \( -perm 777 -o -perm 775 -o -perm 750 -o -perm 711 -o -perm 555 \ > -o -perm 511 \) -print0 | \ > xargs -0 chmod 755 > find -L . \ > \( -perm

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Call for Bug Fixes, Patches, etc

2016-03-12 Thread Ryan P.C. McQuen
> > > On 24/02/16 07:37, Kyle Guinn wrote: > > > On 2/23/16, Andrzej Telszewski wrote: > > >> On 05/02/16 13:48, Martijn Dekker wrote: > > >>> 2. The following horrible, broken and obsolete eyesore: > > >>> > > >>> find -L . \ > > >>>\( -perm 777 -o -perm 775 -o -perm

[Slackbuilds-users] Error while creating nvidia-legacy340-driver package on -current

2016-03-12 Thread Luís Fernando Carvalho Cavalheiro
Dear friend Looks like I found by myself how to solve this issue. Reading nvidia-legacy340-driver.SlackBuild script, I found a commentary that stated nvidia-installer isn't needed by this SlackBuild. So, I commented out all lines related to nvidia-installer building and lo!, it worked! I'm

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg and "non-redistributable binary"

2016-03-12 Thread Andrzej Telszewski
On 12/03/16 23:07, Black Rider wrote: El Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:04:07 +0100, Andrzej Telszewski escribió: Hi, Some of the dependencies for _ffmpeg_ make it "non-redistributable binary". I'd like to ask what does it mean? Does it mean it's forbidden to redistribute the binary because of law

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg and "non-redistributable binary"

2016-03-12 Thread Black Rider
El Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:04:07 +0100, Andrzej Telszewski escribió: > Hi, > > Some of the dependencies for _ffmpeg_ make it "non-redistributable > binary". > > I'd like to ask what does it mean? > > Does it mean it's forbidden to redistribute the binary because of law > restrictions? > > Or does

[Slackbuilds-users] ffmpeg and "non-redistributable binary"

2016-03-12 Thread Andrzej Telszewski
Hi, Some of the dependencies for _ffmpeg_ make it "non-redistributable binary". I'd like to ask what does it mean? Does it mean it's forbidden to redistribute the binary because of law restrictions? Or does it mean the binary will contain instructions that cannot be executed on, for

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] clamtk-5.20 requires perl-glib-1.07, but perl-glib-1.07 is broken

2016-03-12 Thread Glenn Becker
:) On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > perl-pango is one of mine. I will update today if I can (I'm on the > road). > > already did :) > > > -- > Willy Sudiarto Raharjo > > >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] clamtk-5.20 requires perl-glib-1.07, but perl-glib-1.07 is broken

2016-03-12 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> perl-pango is one of mine. I will update today if I can (I'm on the road). already did :) -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] clamtk-5.20 requires perl-glib-1.07, but perl-glib-1.07 is broken

2016-03-12 Thread Glenn Becker
perl-pango is one of mine. I will update today if I can (I'm on the road). /Glenn On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo < will...@slackbuilds.org> wrote: > > clamtk-5.20-x86_64-1_SBo requires perl-glib (1.307) but the perl-glib >