Re: [Slackbuilds-users] lighttpd.SlackBuild needs new maintainer

2016-08-11 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2016-08-12 4:44 GMT+02:00 Andrzej Telszewski : > Hi, > > I contacted current maintainer of lighttpd, Paul Wisehart, and he said he > will no longer maintain the lighttpd.SlackBuild. > > I'm no expert in the area, but I would like to point a few things for the > new

[Slackbuilds-users] lighttpd.SlackBuild needs new maintainer

2016-08-11 Thread Andrzej Telszewski
Hi, I contacted current maintainer of lighttpd, Paul Wisehart, and he said he will no longer maintain the lighttpd.SlackBuild. I'm no expert in the area, but I would like to point a few things for the new maintainer: 1. In

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Comments required for iperf3 submission

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 11/08/16 16:04, Thomas Szteliga wrote: On 11.08.2016 16:42, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: I use iperf3 from time to time and find it very useful. I noticed that SBo only has iperf2 - and would like to submit scripts for iperf3. Is there much interest in this, and also, is there any reason

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Comments required for iperf3 submission

2016-08-11 Thread Thomas Szteliga
On 11.08.2016 16:42, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: I use iperf3 from time to time and find it very useful. I noticed that SBo only has iperf2 - and would like to submit scripts for iperf3. Is there much interest in this, and also, is there any reason why SBo shouldn't have iperf3? the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Comments required for iperf3 submission

2016-08-11 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> I use iperf3 from time to time and find it very useful. I noticed that > SBo only has iperf2 - and would like to submit scripts for iperf3. Is > there much interest in this, and also, is there any reason why SBo > shouldn't have iperf3? the maintainer is no longer active i guess his last update

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Fwd: monit change request

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 08/08/16 13:32, Bryan Harris wrote: Interesting re: the restart command. I think it's fixed by using "monit quit" for the implementation of /etc/rc.d/rc.monit stop --- i.e. more like what the upstream authors would do. It's instantly restarted on my machine when I do restart (using

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Version bump - syncthing 14.4

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 11/08/16 10:57, Willy Sudiarto Raharjo wrote: Please find attached a version bump (plus a few minor corrections) for syncthing Please use the submission form as usual since the submission is now open. This applies to Navit that you sent earlier Sure - thank you Willy

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Version bump - syncthing 14.4

2016-08-11 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
> Please find attached a version bump (plus a few minor corrections) for > syncthing Please use the submission form as usual since the submission is now open. This applies to Navit that you sent earlier -- Willy Sudiarto Raharjo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Slackbuilds-users] Comments required for iperf3 submission

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
I use iperf3 from time to time and find it very useful. I noticed that SBo only has iperf2 - and would like to submit scripts for iperf3. Is there much interest in this, and also, is there any reason why SBo shouldn't have iperf3? ___

[Slackbuilds-users] Version bump - syncthing 14.4

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
Please find attached a version bump (plus a few minor corrections) for syncthing syncthing.tar.gz Description: application/gzip ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Are new submission accepted yet?

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
On 10/08/16 18:35, Rob McGee wrote: On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Sebastian Arcus wrote: On 09/08/16 15:56, Matteo Bernardini wrote: 2016-08-09 16:50 GMT+02:00 Sebastian Arcus : I've searched the list messages over the last few weeks but can't figure the

[Slackbuilds-users] New submission - Navit

2016-08-11 Thread Sebastian Arcus
As previously mentioned on this list, I'd like to submit the package Navit (www.navit-project.org) for inclusion at SBo. I think the appropriate category would be GIS. Many thanks to David Spencer for help with testing and corrections. navit.tar.gz Description: application/gzip