Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error
Thanks for this, Luiz; that worked at my end. Cheers, Rob On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 14:25:07 + slackbuilds-users-requ...@slackbuilds.org wrote: > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 11:24:45 -0300 > From: Luiz Carlos Ramos > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Subject: Re: [Slackbuilds-users] conky compile error > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hi, > > I could do a trick here to make it build in machines where lua 5.3 is > installed alongside lua 5.1. It is done simply adding these two lines > in the cmake invocation: > > -DLUA_LIBRARIES=/usr/lib64/liblua5.3.so \ > -DLUA_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include/lua5.3 \ > > Don't know exactly how it works in the inner bits, but the intention > is to instruct CMake to find the correct version of Lua. > > Hope it helps, > > Luiz Carlos Ramos > S?o Paulo - Brazil -- --- Rob van Nues 13A Lamer Street Dunbar East Lothian EH42 1HJ UK ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Repology a public emailaddress repository; SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 147, Issue 3
On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 16:58:06 + slackbuilds-users-requ...@slackbuilds.org wrote: > Maintainers emails are pretty public in the SBo repository. Well, that is fairly specific environment compared to the big heap repology provides.. > A quick grep shows 761 different maintainers email, of which > 96 are somehow scrambled (of which 4 are yours ^^), and 665 are plain. > > Besides, the kind of scrambling we're talking about > (guy at domain dot tld, or john[dot]doe[at]domain[dot]tld) aren't > really a difficulty for spammers. > I could write a script in 15 minutes that'll scrape plain and > scrambled emails off of any webpages, if they're scrambled like that. Maybe we should consider another way of contacting providers. > > So, well, I don't think you should be more worried now than > you were before. That's not the issue; the fact that personal details get transferred from SBo to another site who actively advertises these details on the basis of a facebook-like argumentation is something that can no longer be accepted as normal. According to eu laws people should be informed about this and asked to opt out if they want to. I do not see the need why repology should be able to publish my details without such provisions. I have repology to remove these details. I do not need and I do not want this kind of PR. And I think Sbo should think much harder than to make these details so publicly available. If they do, it should be via a layer in between; that is, for example, via an SBo-email address that represents the maintainer so that email-requests can be moderated/filtered. I do not want that details that have been in good faith passed on to SBo, are brought onto a platform that, when big and popular enough, will be sold/mined by agencies we are not thinking of as yet. Rob ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
[Slackbuilds-users] Repology again Re: SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 147, Issue 2
Well, it has been raised as an issue but the author cannot see the problem https://github.com/repology/repology/issues/220 This is not what I expected when email addresses were published in info files. Can we take them out?? On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 13:04:36 +0100 rob van nues wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:19:59 + > slackbuilds-users-requ...@slackbuilds.org wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:15:50 +0300 > > From: Petar Petrov > > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Repology: a way to track potential > > updates > > Message-ID: > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > > > Hi guys, > > > > i recently came across the repology website: > > > > https://repology.org/ > > > > it compares packages between distributions and their versions. You > > can search by package maintainer (I found myself by my email) and > > get a list of potential updates. > > > > -petar > > Thanks, Petar; found out that I can update a package... > > What I find quite worrying is that the search by email works too > well. > > Email addresses are somewhat scrambled in the info-files; so why does > this site publish the unscrambled version that can lead to quite a bit > of spam? This seems contrary to policies adhered to here. > > I will ask the maintainer amd...@amdmi3.ru > > rob > -- --- Rob van Nues 13A Lamer Street Dunbar East Lothian EH42 1HJ UK ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 147, Issue 2
On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 11:19:59 + slackbuilds-users-requ...@slackbuilds.org wrote: > Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:15:50 +0300 > From: Petar Petrov > To: "SlackBuilds.org Users List" > Subject: [Slackbuilds-users] Repology: a way to track potential > updates > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Hi guys, > > i recently came across the repology website: > > https://repology.org/ > > it compares packages between distributions and their versions. You can > search by package maintainer (I found myself by my email) and get a > list of potential updates. > > -petar Thanks, Petar; found out that I can update a package... What I find quite worrying is that the search by email works too well. Email addresses are somewhat scrambled in the info-files; so why does this site publish the unscrambled version that can lead to quite a bit of spam? This seems contrary to policies adhered to here. I will ask the maintainer amd...@amdmi3.ru rob -- --- Rob van Nues 13A Lamer Street Dunbar East Lothian EH42 1HJ UK ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
[Slackbuilds-users] prompt_toolkit version used no good for python-2.7
Hi, Thanks for all the python builds. Recently, however, Sbo-upgrades killed my ipython/jupyter setup (in python-2.7). The problem lies with prompt_toolkit-2.0.3 in the slackbuild script for prompt_toolkit. This needs to be a version 1. prompt_toolkit-2.0.3 is incompatible with python-2.7 and maybe not ready for ipython3 https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/11177 https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-prompt-toolkit/issues/647 At first it seemed a swap of versions in the two builds: The 2.0.3 version of prompt_toolkit in the python2 script could have been for python3-prompt_toolkit, which has version 1.0.15, the version that works with python 2; With 2.0.3, also ipython3 (without recompiling) does not work at my end; it gives the same error I noticed when compiling jupyter or starting ipython in the shell: "...from prompt_toolkit.shortcuts import create_prompt_application, create_eventloop, create_prompt_layout, create_output ." HTH rob -- ----------- Rob van Nues 13A Lamer Street Dunbar East Lothian EH42 1HJ UK ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Inkscape 0.92.3 error
On Fri, 04 May 2018 09:33:13 + slackbuilds-users-requ...@slackbuilds.org wrote: >2. Re: Inkscape 0.92.3 error (Ekin Akoglu) >3. Re: Inkscape 0.92.3 error (Ananda Murthy R S) Hi, I have inkscape working as well. But no libiconv on my system. When you do a 'content'-search on the slackware package browser (https://packages.slackware.com/) no libiconv is part of 14.2. A usr/include/iconv.h comes with glibc . Maybe try to find whether you have a package on your box that provides a libiconv and needs to be removed/changed in order to let inkscape compile. It could interfere with glibc it seems according to this old thread on LQ: https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/undefined-reference-to-libiconv-341284/ HTH Rob ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
Re: [Slackbuilds-users] SlackBuilds-users Digest, Vol 143, Issue 12; Updates - 20180303.1
Hi, The Slackbuild for clamav-0.99.4 in ponce's -current branch stalls. The patch-line needs to be removed/commented out (this line is gone from the clamav.Slackbuild for the stable-branch which works ok) Hth Rob ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
[Slackbuilds-users] Fwd: Rstudio 0.98 no longer runs/compiles on Slackware current
- Forwarded Message - From: "rob van nues" To: "michael stewart" Sent: Saturday, 6 May, 2017 12:34:45 PM Subject: Rstudio 0.98 no longer runs/compiles on Slackware current Hi Michael, Since the recent upgrade of boost, Rstudio 0.98 on SBo won't run: "bash-4.4$ rstudio rstudio: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_date_time.so.1.61.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory " nor compile. Maybe the latter is due to gcc 7 or other dependencies (please see below remarks on LQ) https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/sbo-scripts-not-building-on-current-read-1st-post-pls-4175561999/page38.html#post5706804 I myself am not using R or R-studio at the moment (but have had some tutorials in the past on R and still keep it in case I'll need to use it again). Cheers, Rob - Forwarded Message - From: "LinuxQuestions.org" To: rvn...@tesco.net Sent: Saturday, 6 May, 2017 10:19:20 AM Subject: Reply to thread 'SBo scripts not building on current (read 1st post, pls)' Dear brobr, ponce has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - SBo scripts not building on current (read 1st post, pls) - in the Slackware forum of LinuxQuestions.org. This thread is located at: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/sbo-scripts-not-building-on-current-read-1st-post-pls-4175561999-new/ Here is the message that has just been posted: *** rstudio-desktop script will need a little refactoring to work with the new 1.0.143 version (there will also be additional dependencies, like qt5-webki *** There may also be other replies, but you will not receive any more notifications until you visit the forum again. All the best, LinuxQuestions.org ~ Unsubscription information: To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit this page: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/subscription.php?do=removesubscription&type=thread&subscriptionid=2475606&auth=3b499537cfbf333cb6c497c27cd53a3f To unsubscribe from ALL threads, please visit this page: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/subscription.php?do=viewsubscription&folderid=all ___ SlackBuilds-users mailing list SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/ FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
