On 05/02/18 00:25, André Barboza wrote:
> audio/opencore-amr
I'll take this one.
chris
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackb
On 3/4/18, Glenn Becker wrote:
>
> development/bsdiff
> games/golly
I'll take these two.
> libraries/jbigkit
Whoever takes splix should take jbigkit. I don't want splix as I haven't
got any of the printers it supports... but if nobody steps up & takes
splix, I'll take jbigkit rather than see it
Hi,
an idea of what I did wrong ?
patching file qwtfunctions.pri
Info: creating stash file /tmp/SBo/qwt-6.1.3/build/.qmake.stash
cd src/ && ( test -e Makefile || /usr/bin/qmake-qt5
/tmp/SBo/qwt-6.1.3/src/src.pro LIBDIRSUFFIX= -o Makefile ) && make -f Makefile
make[1] : on entre dans le répertoir
2018-03-05 11:50 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Falsetti :
> Hi,
> an idea of what I did wrong ?
>
> patching file qwtfunctions.pri
> Info: creating stash file /tmp/SBo/qwt-6.1.3/build/.qmake.stash
> cd src/ && ( test -e Makefile || /usr/bin/qmake-qt5
> /tmp/SBo/qwt-6.1.3/src/src.pro LIBDIRSUFFIX= -o Makefile
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 12:18:18 +0100
Matteo Bernardini wrote:
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> which version of qt5 do you have installed in your system?
qt5-5.7.1-i586-1_SBo
on 32-bit machine
> ___
> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.
On Sunday, 4 March 2018 08:46:28 PST Konrad J Hambrick wrote:
> Wow Ben.
>
> I checked out QGIS' Home Page: https://qgis.org/en/site/
>
> It is a very impressive piece of work !
>
> Speaking of work, I wish I had time to test your qgis-3.SlackBuild but I've
> got my hands full right now.
If yo
On Monday, 5 March 2018 02:50:51 PST Frédéric Falsetti wrote:
> Hi,
> an idea of what I did wrong ?
>
> patching file qwtfunctions.pri
> Info: creating stash file /tmp/SBo/qwt-6.1.3/build/.qmake.stash
> cd src/ && ( test -e Makefile || /usr/bin/qmake-qt5
> /tmp/SBo/qwt-6.1.3/src/src.pro LIBDIRSUFF
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 09:21:41PM -0500, Glenn Becker wrote:
>development/gprolog
I'll take gprolog
>games/nethack
Oops, looks like I snoozed too long to get this one :'(
>Glenn Becker
Thanks for all of your hard work through the years, Glenn.
--
Erik Falor
Registered Linux U
On Mon, 05 Mar 2018 07:33:10 -0800
Benjamin Trigona-Harany wrote:
>
> Hi Frédéric, I should have mentioned that I only tested on Slackware64, so
> thanks for checking the process on 32-bit Slackware.
>
> Could you try adding -fPIC to line 82 of the SlackBuild so it looks like this:
>
> CXXFLA
qca-qt5.info
DOWNLOAD="https://github.com/KDE/qca/archive/v2.1.3.tar.gz";
qca-qt5.SlackBuild
SRCNAM=qca
PRGNAM=$SRCNAM-qt5
VERSION=${VERSION:-2.1.3}
--> mv v2.1.3.tar.gz qca-2.1.3.tar.gz
On Mon, 05 Mar 2018 07:28:41 -0800
Benjamin Trigona-Harany wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 March 2018 08:46:28 PST Ko
On 3/5/18, Frédéric Falsetti wrote:
> DOWNLOAD="https://github.com/KDE/qca/archive/v2.1.3.tar.gz";
No!
Use this URL:
https://github.com/KDE/qca/archive/v2.1.3/qca-2.1.3.tar.gz
This will result in the downloaded file being called qca-2.1.3.tar.gz
regardless of whether content-disposition is su
Hi,
This is what I get from md5sum check:
md5sum <<<"1dba769f0eb1303ef3fbd873acd81901 keepassxc-2.3.0-src.tar.xz"
3a23e743875536ebcb3d8ba7dc1fff44 -
Is there something wrong?
Best,
Ekin
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbui
Hi,
This is what I get from md5sum check:
md5sum <<<"a9627ca9e0011a422f5255be0173f271 smplayer-18.2.2.tar.bz2"
8d32dcea7c78aa17c05d9d65c02aef50 -
Could there be something wrong?
Best,
Ekin
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slack
> This is what I get from md5sum check:
>
> md5sum <<<"1dba769f0eb1303ef3fbd873acd81901 keepassxc-2.3.0-src.tar.xz"
> 3a23e743875536ebcb3d8ba7dc1fff44 -
>
> Is there something wrong?
Hi Ekin
It has been fixed in GIT
https://git.slackbuilds.org/slackbuilds/commit/?id=0eb028b08
--
Willy Sudia
> This is what I get from md5sum check:
>
> md5sum <<<"a9627ca9e0011a422f5255be0173f271 smplayer-18.2.2.tar.bz2"
> 8d32dcea7c78aa17c05d9d65c02aef50 -
>
> Could there be something wrong?
I checked and it gives me a correct checksum
md5sum smplayer-18.2.2.tar.bz2
a9627ca9e0011a422f5255be0173f271
Sorry, this is totally my stupid mistake, I excluded the "-c" switch
that is why I got a mismatch.
Please excuse me.
Best,
Ekin
On 05/03/18 21:44, Ekin Akoglu wrote:
Hi,
This is what I get from md5sum check:
md5sum <<<"a9627ca9e0011a422f5255be0173f271 smplayer-18.2.2.tar.bz2"
8d32dcea7c78
Hi,
Following last week's update, here's another big batch which mirrors
some of the sources into Ponce's personal repository to provide more
alternative for hosting the sources. It's almost 300 commits so it has
to be pushed forward before it gets bigger.
We also have some updates such as hhvm,
QScintilla-qt5 configure fails with:
install -m 755 -p libqscintillaplugin.so
/tmp/SBo/package-QScintilla-qt5/usr/lib/qt5/plugins/designer/libqscintillaplugin.so
strip --strip-unneeded
/tmp/SBo/package-QScintilla-qt5/usr/lib/qt5/plugins/designer/libqscintillaplugin.so
/tmp/SBo/QScintilla_gpl-2.1
On Monday, 5 March 2018 11:32:45 PST Frédéric Falsetti wrote:
> QScintilla-qt5 configure fails with:
>
> install -m 755 -p libqscintillaplugin.so
> /tmp/SBo/package-QScintilla-qt5/usr/lib/qt5/plugins/designer/libqscintillap
> lugin.so strip --strip-unneeded
> /tmp/SBo/package-QScintilla-qt5/usr/li
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018, 8:16 PM Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
wrote:
> Also it's a good idea to take a look on pasture branch again. There we
> have more than 100 scripts with no maintainers and some of them probably
> have broken links or even broken build as well. We hope someone would
> adopt the script
> What's the easiest way to view what scripts are in pasture? Are we
> supposed to just look through the commit log for the pasture branch or
> is there some easily viewable list of all SlackBuilds in pasture available?
Yes, unfortunately the only way to see is by looking at pasture branch
https:/
>> What's the easiest way to view what scripts are in pasture? Are we
>> supposed to just look through the commit log for the pasture branch or
>> is there some easily viewable list of all SlackBuilds in pasture available?
>
> Yes, unfortunately the only way to see is by looking at pasture branch
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
