Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-22 Thread or...@fredslev.dk
Sorry for the slow reply. I lost interest in pushing this when it became clear that merging a simple patch required more energy than I had to expend... Take it or leave it, I'm not interested in fighting over this. Previous e-mails were written a while ago and with a previous e-mail address.

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-09 Thread Christoph Willing
On 10/05/18 09:43, Daniel Prosser wrote: >>> Hint to alsa-enthusiasts: suggest your alsa-tested switch arrangement > directly to the relevant maintainers. I'm sure such suggestions would > mostly be adopted provided They don't adversely affect normal systems.  > > Isn't that exactly what Hunter

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-09 Thread Daniel Prosser
>> Hint to alsa-enthusiasts: suggest your alsa-tested switch arrangement >> directly to the relevant maintainers. I'm sure such suggestions would mostly >> be adopted provided They don't adversely affect normal systems. Isn't that exactly what Hunter has done? On May 9, 2018 5:53 PM, Christoph

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-09 Thread Christoph Willing
On 10/05/18 06:53, Richard Narron wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > >> 2018-05-07 23:36 GMT+02:00 or...@fredslev.dk : >>> That assumption is irrelevant and if a maintainer is not willing to >>> respond to bug reports then it should be possible to implement

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-09 Thread Richard Narron
On Tue, 8 May 2018, Matteo Bernardini wrote: > 2018-05-07 23:36 GMT+02:00 or...@fredslev.dk : > > That assumption is irrelevant and if a maintainer is not willing to > > respond to bug reports then it should be possible to implement fixes > > without the maintainer. > > > > The

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-08 Thread Andrzej Telszewski
On 09/05/18 00:12, Christoph Willing wrote: In my case, I use git branches to accommodate the different SlackBuild versions I want to maintain. Apart from the branches connected with SlackBuilds for which I am the maintainer (therefore conforming strictly to SBo conventions), I have a separate

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-08 Thread Christoph Willing
On 08/05/18 05:53, or...@fredslev.dk wrote: [snip] > It would really mean a lot to me > if this was applied to qt5 too so I that I didn't constantly have to > edit the SlackBuild every time I update or rebuild qt5. Something which > I routinely forget to do until the build fails... > Many

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-08 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2018-05-07 23:36 GMT+02:00 or...@fredslev.dk : > That assumption is irrelevant and if a maintainer is not willing to > respond to bug reports then it should be possible to implement fixes > without the maintainer. > > The bottom line is that this patch would make the

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-08 Thread or...@fredslev.dk
That assumption is irrelevant and if a maintainer is not willing to respond to bug reports then it should be possible to implement fixes without the maintainer. The bottom line is that this patch would make the qt5.SlackBuild more fail proof and the only reason to not accept it is to spite people

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-07 Thread Larry Hajali
Hi, > I e-mailed a very small patch to the qt5.SlackBuild maintainer more > than once to allow dynamically detecting if pulseaudio is installed with > pkg-config and disabling it if its not. However its been a few weeks > since my last attempt and much longer for the previous ones. I have >

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] qt5 + pulseaudio

2018-05-07 Thread Matteo Bernardini
2018-05-07 21:53 GMT+02:00 or...@fredslev.dk : > Hi, > > I e-mailed a very small patch to the qt5.SlackBuild maintainer more > than once to allow dynamically detecting if pulseaudio is installed with > pkg-config and disabling it if its not. However its been a few weeks > since