Re: Source Tree Structure

2009-02-12 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
Hi all, first of all +1 for a restructuring. Separating the contrib stuff from the main code, but still having the possibility to check out everything in one place, makes a lot of sense. If more and more new bundles come in (ala CookingEggServiceBundle), which won't be actively maintained most of

Re: Source Tree Structure

2009-02-12 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@day.com wrote: I might look a bit ugly, but [...] Well, this might be true (you decide), but what I really wanted to say was: It might look a bit ugly... ;-) Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek alexander.klimetsc...@day.com

Re: Source Tree Structure

2009-02-12 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote: Please keep in mind that Sling is a very modular system consisting mainly of a variety of bundles. Sling has the intent to separately release single modules (bundles). This is one of the number one priorities

Re: Source Tree Structure

2009-02-11 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting wrote: IMHO, the trunk should contain *exactly* what goes into a release. I.e. a release should pretty much be just a packaged export of a tagged version of the trunk. If we want to track things that aren't (yet) going to be included in the next release, then they should be