Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-08 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Montag, den 07.01.2008, 17:45 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: I'm wondering when we follow the supposed version guide if our current versions are correct: 2.0.0-incubator-snapshot uses an even micro version, but it should be an odd one (as it is a snapshot) :) So it seems that we

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-08 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 06.01.2008, 20:46 +0200 schrieb Jukka Zitting: Hi, On Jan 6, 2008 8:26 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Version comparison is in terms of comparing each version part to each other. The numeric parts are compared as would be expected. The qualifier part

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Felix Meschberger wrote: Yes, the initial release breaks the rules in two aspects: The SNAPSHOT is even and it will encompass almost everything :-) Of course we could turn back the current release numbers to 1.9.9-incubtator-SNAPSHOT and then comply with the concept... But I am not sure,

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-07 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Jan 6, 2008 11:57 PM, Robert Biernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...As someone who has only been following this project for a short amount of time I think before a release is done a better sample application needs to be produced along with some documentation that explains how web

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-06 Thread pih
Makes sense, +1 for me on the scheme. Paddy Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 19:26:24 To:sling-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Thoughts towards an initial release Hi, The OSGi core spec

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Jan 6, 2008 8:26 PM, Felix Meschberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Version comparison is in terms of comparing each version part to each other. The numeric parts are compared as would be expected. The qualifier part is compared with string comparsion, where of course is smaller than

RE: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-06 Thread Robert Biernat
From: Felix Meschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 7/01/2008 5:26 AM To: sling-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Thoughts towards an initial release Hi, The OSGi core spec defines the Version as a quadruple 1.2.3.string. The first three parts

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-04 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
I like the versioning scheme. I have one question regarding branches, you write: For branching, the branch always gets an incremented micro version number. For example when branching off _2.1.1-SNAPSHOT_ the branch version would be _2.2.1-SNAPSHOT_. The text says increasing the micro version

Re: Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-04 Thread Felix Meschberger
Am Freitag, den 04.01.2008, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: I like the versioning scheme. I have one question regarding branches, you write: For branching, the branch always gets an incremented micro version number. For example when branching off _2.1.1-SNAPSHOT_ the branch version

Thoughts towards an initial release

2008-01-03 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi all, I have been thinking about releases and version numbers in Sling and wrote up an initial text on that at [1]. The page is currently missing the actual list of bundles, we would want to include in the initial release. This is something, which still has to be defined. WDYT ? Regards