Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-12 Thread Matt Palmer
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 02:27:17PM +1000, Philip Greggs wrote: Extreme examples are codefests in Wollongong in recent times. If you remember or check the Archives, it was announced only Debian installs will be done. 1) Installfest, not codefest 2) Ubuntu, not Debian 3) It was only for UoW

Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-11 Thread Philip Greggs
On 4/6/06, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: quote who=Philip Greggs The rumour vines says this: intending members using other distros are discouraged altogether from becoming members. The President's report was making this plain and clear - declining membership in recent years. I

Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-11 Thread James Purser
Extreme examples are codefests in Wollongong in recent times. If you remember or check the Archives, it was announced only Debian installs will be done. Leaving aside the rest of the message can I make a couple of corrections here please. Firstly it was an installfest not a code fest,

Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-11 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Philip Greggs I don't think this is accurate at all. Membership has been declining due to the change in demographic Demography as I understand is a basket of things like Age, Sex, Race, Education, and similar categories. This can't be correlated to decline in SLUG membership.

Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-06 Thread Craige McWhirter
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 12:09 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: I think the thing to take out of this discussion is that it takes a lot of work to build a community, and if you want to get a particular thing out of your community, you need to contribute and work towards it. In 2001 (I think) I wanted to

Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-06 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:53:30PM +1000, Craige McWhirter wrote: Many great ideas, projects and partnerships have spawned from those meetings. Within a few meetings it had gone from being Debian only talk topics to more like SLUG-Social - with the name never being changed because no one could

Re: Those who do... [Was: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report]

2006-04-06 Thread Peter Hardy
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 19:04 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 05:53:30PM +1000, Craige McWhirter wrote: Many great ideas, projects and partnerships have spawned from those meetings. Within a few meetings it had gone from being Debian only talk topics to more like

[SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Matt Palmer
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:55:19PM +1000, Philip Greggs wrote: SLUG server being offline for a few extended outages due to hardware issues which thankfully have now been sorted recently by removing hardware from the equation - ie it's now on a virtual server. I check SLUG web site daily.

Re: [SLUG] Re: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-05 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Matt Palmer neutral. It is perceived SLUG is driven by self-interest. There are Self-interest (enlightened, if possible) is the best driver there is. Pure selflessness isn't really in vogue any more, and I don't think it works really well without an external influence to keep

Re: [SLUG] RE: 2006 President's Report

2006-04-04 Thread James Purser
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 12:55 +1000, Philip Greggs wrote: What I heard from the rumour vines is that SLUG has become too Debianized and/or Ubuntoized instead of being Linux Distribution neutral. It is perceived SLUG is driven by self-interest. There are many Suse, Gentoo, RH, FC, etc, users than