Re: [SLUG] eth0 card problem

2001-06-18 Thread Herbert Xu
Terry Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ken Foskey wrote: modprobe ne This might locate the card for you, it did for me. irq=3 io=0x300 Only if your card is set to the default irq io Otherwise, it will probably tell you it is busy. Or if you set the correct options in

Re: [SLUG] eth0 card problem

2001-06-17 Thread Ken Foskey
Joshua Burvill wrote: Then back in linux as root, modprobe ne irq=10 io=0x340 (or whatever it is) just run modprobe ne This might locate the card for you, it did for me. irq=3 io=0x300 Thanks KenF -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More

Re: [SLUG] eth0 card problem

2001-06-17 Thread Terry Collins
Ken Foskey wrote: modprobe ne This might locate the card for you, it did for me. irq=3 io=0x300 Only if your card is set to the default irq io Otherwise, it will probably tell you it is busy. -- Terry Collins {:-)}}} Ph(02) 4627 2186 Fax(02) 4628 7861 email: [EMAIL

[SLUG] eth0 card problem

2001-06-15 Thread Wayne Crich
I've set up my first Linux only box at home. Redhat 7., kde the works. It's great and it has helped in getting a handle on Linux as a desktop machine. I boot this morning at the message comes up that either IRQ or io ports are incoreect for eth0 so no network. It worked on installation and I got

Re: [SLUG] eth0 card problem

2001-06-15 Thread Jon Biddell
On Saturday 16 June 2001 11:20, Wayne Crich wrote: I've set up my first Linux only box at home. Redhat 7., kde the works. It's great and it has helped in getting a handle on Linux as a desktop machine. I boot this morning at the message comes up that either IRQ or io ports are incoreect for