What about tools like discwizard from ibm/seagate. Guess there have a
bios extension thingy which actually resides on the hard drive.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:51:58PM +1000, Jon Biddell wrote:
At 10:12 30/04/02 +1000, Matthew Dalton wrote:
Jon Biddell wrote:
The reason I ask is I fell
Did you have to pay for the bios upgrade ?
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Matthew Dalton
Sent: Tuesday, 30 April 2002 10:13 AM
To: Jon Biddell
Cc: Slug
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Are these specs OK for RH7.2
Jon Biddell wrote
At 10:12 30/04/02 +1000, Matthew Dalton wrote:
Jon Biddell wrote:
The reason I ask is I fell into the trap of installing a pair of 40Gb
Seagates ($168 odd each at the moment !!) and my bios would only recognise
them as 32Gb An Ultra TX/2 ATA100 controller fixed that, although they
Alex Samad wrote:
Did you have to pay for the bios upgrade ?
Nope. Just downloaded it, that's all.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
looks fine to me. I've read that the ac97 sound can
be a little problematical but I'm sure it's fixable
by upgrading something or other.
btw, you might want to wait for redhat 7.3; it's almost
out -- there are beta's available.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:02:44 +1000
Matthew Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
btw, you might want to wait for redhat 7.3; it's almost
out -- there are beta's available.
Umm, if you are referring to skipjack, I was unaware it was a 7.3 beta
Kevin
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group -
quote who=Kevin Waterson
Umm, if you are referring to skipjack, I was unaware it was a 7.3 beta
skipjack is indeed the 7.3 beta; I'm intrigued to know what you thought it
was. :-)
- Jeff
--
I came for the quality, but I stayed for the freedom. - Sean Neakums
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux
:40 PM
To: 'Simon Bryan'; 'Slug'
Subject: RE: [SLUG] Are these specs OK for RH7.2
With fear of retribution in mind, I would suggest to replace all Ipex
Components ;)
Seriously, I actually just put debian woody onto exactly the same machine
and had no problems at all. The only thing I
At 14:16 29/04/02 +1000, Simon Bryan wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking at putting RH7.2 on the following machine and wondered if
anyone had heard anything good or bad about the system. I would be upgrading
to 512MB RAM and a 40GB 0r 60GB HDD.
Simon,
The spec seems to look fine - the only concern is
I wouldn't have bothered with the extra expense of the card
just make sure there is a /boot partition within the first 32gig or so
The linux kernel is perfectly ok with ide disks it just ignores that the
bios has to say on the matter
My laptop has a 12gb disk in it bios only supports 8gb
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Kevin Waterson
Umm, if you are referring to skipjack, I was unaware it was a 7.3 beta
skipjack is indeed the 7.3 beta; I'm intrigued to know what you thought it
was. :-)
Well strictly speaking, they haven't given a number for
the next version, so it skipjack
Jon Biddell wrote:
The reason I ask is I fell into the trap of installing a pair of 40Gb
Seagates ($168 odd each at the moment !!) and my bios would only recognise
them as 32Gb An Ultra TX/2 ATA100 controller fixed that, although they
are now hde and hdf...:-(
Did you try updating your
Hi
It's a bit hard to answer positively.
Have you checked out the following page at Red Hat?
http://hardware.redhat.com/hcl/genpage2.cgi?pagename=hcl
Chris
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:16:27 +1000 Simon Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am looking at putting RH7.2 on the following machine
With fear of retribution in mind, I would suggest to replace all Ipex
Components ;)
Seriously, I actually just put debian woody onto exactly the same machine
and had no problems at all. The only thing I haven't played with on my
sirius box is the sound (as it is only acting as a netsaint server,
14 matches
Mail list logo
