Re: [SLUG] Spellchecking

2015-02-19 Thread Rachel Polanskis
On 20 Feb 2015, at 1:33 pm, Michael Chesterton che...@chesterton.id.au wrote:


I have started using “enchant” for the claws-mail OSX port I am working on.
I had to hunt for the en_AU dictionary for it which is sourced from aspell.

I think enchant is just a refreshed version of aspell, but I know ispell is 
a bit ancient now and not as reliable.


rachel


 On 16/02/15 17:15, William Bennett wrote:
 Up to now, I've always felt that ispell was pretty good.
 
 But I thought I'd enquire.
 
 Has anybody experience with any others?
 
 William Bennett.
 
 I use ispell in irssi, and it's not that good at unravelling the noodliness
 of my mind and guessing what I meant to spell.
 
 If one character is wrong, it will make the right suggestion, but if
 two characters are wrong, forget about it. If ispell can't make a
 suggestion, I then I google it, and google always knows what I meant
 to spell. Pretty scary.
 
 here's a weird example:
 
 dribl
 
 ispell says
 
  dribl 5 0: drib, dribs, drib l, drib-l, drill
 
 aspell says
 
  dribl 19 0: dribble, drably, tribal, drill, dribbler, drivel, drub,
 durable, durably, dbl, driblet, droll, drool, drab, treble, drawl,
 trial, tribe, trill
 
 I have heard in the past aspell is better, and I would concur.


—
Rachel Polanskis Kingswood, Greater Western Sydney, Australia 
gr...@exemail.com.au IT consulting, security, programming
The more an answer costs, the more respect it carries.





-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Spellchecking

2015-02-19 Thread Michael Chesterton
On 16/02/15 17:15, William Bennett wrote:
 Up to now, I've always felt that ispell was pretty good.

 But I thought I'd enquire.

 Has anybody experience with any others?

 William Bennett.

I use ispell in irssi, and it's not that good at unravelling the noodliness
of my mind and guessing what I meant to spell.

If one character is wrong, it will make the right suggestion, but if
two characters are wrong, forget about it. If ispell can't make a
suggestion, I then I google it, and google always knows what I meant
to spell. Pretty scary.

here's a weird example:

dribl

ispell says

 dribl 5 0: drib, dribs, drib l, drib-l, drill

aspell says

 dribl 19 0: dribble, drably, tribal, drill, dribbler, drivel, drub,
durable, durably, dbl, driblet, droll, drool, drab, treble, drawl,
trial, tribe, trill

I have heard in the past aspell is better, and I would concur.



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html