[slurm-dev] Re: mail job status to user

On 01/10/2017 12:46 AM, Christopher Samuel wrote: On 10/01/17 09:36, Steven Lo wrote: Torque/Maui has the ability to mail user about the job status automatically when job exit. Does Slurm has the same feature without using the SBATCH command in the job submission? Unless Torque has

[slurm-dev] Re: Prolog behavior with and without srun

On 10/01/17 10:57, Christopher Samuel wrote: > If you are unlucky enough to have SSH based job launchers then you would > also look at the BYU contributed pam_slurm_adopt Actually this is useful even without that as it allows users to SSH into a node they have a job on and not disturb the cores

[slurm-dev] Re: Prolog behavior with and without srun

On 06/01/17 15:08, Vicker, Darby (JSC-EG311) wrote: > Among other things we want the prolog and epilog scripts to clean up any > stray processes. I would argue that a much better way to do that is to use Slurm's cgroups support, that will contain a jobs processes into the cgroup allowing it to

[slurm-dev] mail job status to user

Hi, We are currently using Torque/Maui on some of the cluster and Slurm on others. Torque/Maui has the ability to mail user about the job status automatically when job exit. Does Slurm has the same feature without using the SBATCH command in the job submission? #SBATCH --mail-type=ALL

[slurm-dev] Re: Slurm versions 15.08.13, 16.05.7 and 17.02.0-pre4 are now available (CVE-2016-10030)

Hi Tim, Thanks for the fix, but would it be also possible to backport it into the older versions of Slurm? At least into 14.03.x and 14.11.x? Best regards, Taras On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Tim Wickberg wrote: > > The 16.05.8 tarball published yesterday contained a