[slurm-dev] Re: mail job status to user

On 16/01/17 15:56, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > I think you are right actually. Might have also been configurable > system-wide. The difference though, still, is that you don't have to > provide an e-mail address, so you could share a script like this and it > would work for anyone without

[slurm-dev] Re: mail job status to user

On Jan 15, 2017, at 22:17, Lev Lafayette > wrote: On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 17:40 -0800, Christopher Samuel wrote: On 10/01/17 18:56, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote: For the record: Torque will always send mail if a job is aborted It's been

[slurm-dev] Re: mail job status to user

On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 17:40 -0800, Christopher Samuel wrote: > On 10/01/17 18:56, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote: > > > For the record: Torque will always send mail if a job is aborted > > It's been a few years since I've used Torque so I don't remember that > behaviour. > I recall that as something

[slurm-dev] Re: mail job status to user

On 10/01/17 18:56, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote: > For the record: Torque will always send mail if a job is aborted It's been a few years since I've used Torque so I don't remember that behaviour. Thanks for the info! -- Christopher SamuelSenior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian

[slurm-dev] Re: mail job status to user

On 14/01/17 09:28, Steven Lo wrote: > Is it true that there is no configurable parameter to achieve what we > want to do and user need to specific in > either the sbatch or the submission script? Not that I'm aware of. A submit filter would let you set that up though. All the best, Chris --