[slurm-dev] Re: NFSv4

2016-05-25 15:34 GMT+02:00 Robbert Eggermont : > > Hi Mike, > > On 25-05-16 13:22, Mike Johnson wrote: > >> I am in an environment that uses NFSv4, which obviously needs >> user credentials to grant access to filesystems. Has anyone else >> tackled the issue of unattended

[slurm-dev] Re: NFSv4

Hi, We are using a homegrown solution for ticket propagation to jobs (we mainly use it for AFS but have hopes of also using it for Lustre in a not too distant future). We have run it in production for about 9 months now and in various test-systems for perhaps two years. I have no real

[slurm-dev] Re: NFSv4

Hi, On 05/25/2016 13:21, Mike Johnson wrote: > I know this is a long-standing question, but thought it was worth > asking. I am in an environment that uses NFSv4, which obviously needs > user credentials to grant access to filesystems. Has anyone else > tackled the issue of unattended batch

[slurm-dev] Re: NFSv4

Hi Mike, On 25-05-16 13:22, Mike Johnson wrote: I am in an environment that uses NFSv4, which obviously needs user credentials to grant access to filesystems. Has anyone else tackled the issue of unattended batch jobs successfully? I'm aware of AUKS. We are using Kerberised NFS4 with Slurm

[slurm-dev] RE: NFSv4

They've been doing things like this at CERN for donkeys years - with the Andrew File System in the past. Look for Ticket Granting Tickets. Sorry - my memory is getting hazy. -Original Message- From: Mike Johnson [mailto:m.d.john...@durhamonline.org] Sent: 25 May 2016 12:22 To: